In Kaliningrad 64 nuclear warheads against Berlin

“In Kaliningrad 64 nuclear warheads against Berlin”

0619052740bff68f3c8764e28a03bb6b18bee516b

“Putin’s nuclear missiles aimed at Berlin”. Antonio Capricaformer RAI correspondent in Moscow, faces a hardened Russian journalist colleague Vladimir Soloviev. TO Front and backon Rete 4, a very close personal talk about the war in Ukraine will be broadcast, with “the voice” of Wladimir Putin for Russian television (which has already been sanctioned with the confiscation of its megavilla on Lake Como), which denies any culpability for the horrors of the war in the Kremlin Bucha to the rocket at the train station Kramatorsk.

missile systems.  Will Putin stop Ukraine?  What was aired last year |  Search

Soloviev confirms Moscow’s version of “preventive” and “defensive” war against the nuclear threat posed by a NATO “bridgehead” Ukraine at Russia’s gates. And Caprarica blurts out: “The Russian missiles in Kaliningrad reach Berlin 45 seconds. They officially have 64 nuclear warheads aimed at Berlin and the West. What do we do? NATO should attack Russia because you did 64 nuclear warheads Betting on Germany, much closer than those that haven’t been since Kharkiv In Moscow? That does not exist! How can you justify an attack when you have nuclear warheads aimed at Europe? Do you deny that there are these warheads in Kaliningrad? “.

“I just don’t know, tell me today,” Soloviev replies. “Then make inquiries!” urges Caprarica. “I don’t think it suits you saying I’m misinformed, I’m saying what I know.” “Then he’s a liar. You can choose between these two alternatives: if you deny that there are 64 nuclear warheads in Kaliningrad, or you are a liar or misinformed.” The discussion goes further: “Mr. Caprarica, can you prove that or do you like to shout? If he wants to insult me, we’ll do it together. Otherwise, respect the rules of etiquette. Berlin is not a threat to us because Berlin has no nuclear threat…” “You still don’t answer, you beat the bush. Are there nuclear warheads in Kaliningrad or not? It’s not a Berlin problem, if you come to tell us the story of the nonexistent NATO missiles in Kharkiv near Moscow, you honestly have to admit that you have nuclear warheads much closer to a major European capital than vice versa.

Bombers with nuclear weapons.  Russia, Swedish Airspace Violated: Threat to NATO?  It's not an accident