How I missed that bunch of pigs, regà.
After about twenty days of spending on Netflix and Prime watching good movies and TV series, I felt almost weird, I can tell you that. It was all too well written and above all wonderfully acted, I was no longer used to it. I really had to go back to Guilty Pleasure par excellence men and women, and all its desperate protagonists. People who agonize over their own bullshit, who think they’re stealing from thieves’ homes, but end up shooting themselves in the foot. And I see that with the new year you haven’t lost your good and old habits, aunt’s little star.
In short, we started 2023 with a beautiful climax of terrification. A revival (and who would have ever expected that, after months and months in the shadow of her goddaughter Ida Platano!) Gemma Galganicompletely shameless and in a “psycho-physical-emotional turbulence” (cit.), Alessandro Sposito Rooster version in the chicken coop e Paula Ruocco how the misled and forsaken are belittled.
And I don’t mean to sound cynical, but I’m fighting to save one of the three. In fact, if I really had to choose, paradoxically, the least bad thing would be the knight. Because that he has a genuine interest in women from at least three different generations (and differs from one another in everything, not just age) is frankly not believable, and that’s it. The fact that he likes to be in more shoes, as the study center assures him, is little but certain. But that he could have fallen into this old fox’s ‘trap’ Paula it seems equally plausible to me, chevvedevodì.
That it is a sin to think badly, but it is often right in everyday life, let alone men and women. And it all felt so TERRIBLELY TOO MUCH today that if I had to give anyone good faith I’d have to do it (without betting a dime, mind you. That we know all too well that the cleanest guy around here still has mange …) I would give it to him. As for “the problem is that I’ve never seen the previous installments”. The certainly more sympathetic, but less experienced television dynamics. The perfect scapegoat for caught beautiful ladies with obvious drama queen ambitions.
Short Summary: Alexander came into the studio and said that he and Paula they went out, they had fun, there was a good kiss, but then they stopped and didn’t move on because he was still planning on getting to know the other ladies. As soon as she heard “Kiss in the Shape”, she became confused and did a climax scene, only to confess at the end of the episode that “we made love with a capital A, and the next day I broke out two packets of tissues with tears of joy, moved because I haven’t had certain feelings for years and I thought I couldn’t have them.” But he didn’t tell him, eh, he rightly waited for the episode to reveal it to him.
Come on, but how can you blindly believe the version Ruocco? How can Maria DeFilippi take it forever if it leaks everywhere? Just because she shed half a tear as she emphatically walked out of the studio to do a little scene means it Alexander did he necessarily lie? What if both did it instead? Why rule out BOTH telling their dose of celebratory bullshit to cover their ass?
It seems clear to me that after the fact BOTH knowingly agreed not to say anything in the studio, but for VERY different reasons. It was convenient for him not to upset the other ladies he was visiting (eg Paula I think he took advantage of that because he’s not stupid…) and when he got to the episode he kept the version they agreed on the night before. She, on the other hand, really gives me the look of a person who has studied the dynamics of this program well, and her previous ones in the middle prove it. On the previous take he had sensed the potential that such a sought-after driver could have since stepping in and he immediately found a way to wallow in it.
I really see it as a good strategist (like he says Gemmona), agree with someone Alexander to the hotel to make sure she doesn’t say anything to anyone, but when she got to Elios’s she ran off to tell the management everything (quot.) to pass for the poor victim of someone who, after having a nice evening at the Studio Center, she boils it all down to the usual “punch kiss.”
A version that wouldn’t have made any sense if this statement about the “feelings you made me feel after years!” hadn’t done it too much. Definitely TOO. First, because they’ve seen each other half the time, a jewel You always encourage her for the way she pounces hungrily on anyone who accidentally speaks to her, inviting random emotions at first external how come no one is confused in front of him Paula Who did practically THE SAME?
And second, regà, why he had said that those overwhelming feelings had been awakened once more by her burning night. Of course, passion makes you go insane, please. But no, that’s not the case with Paula. She explained that she heard “an EXPLOSION” at the precise moment he – in front of her, who asked him how he was used to living with his acquaintances, whether he was a roommate or not – replied “in in my case, each for their own home.” Just that incredibly romantic and meaningful moment there, his words, oh.
And me on this sensational shit, I swear.
video from the episode: Full episode – Tina: “Stop staring at me!” – Gemma: “Agostino, I got distracted by another acquaintance…” – A four-way confrontation – Tina: “Gemma, but how are you feeling?” – Maria: “Gemma, but how are you feeling?” “Alessandro, if I had been Paola, I would have reacted very badly…” – Maria: “The rooms? Alessandro, here is a message…”