Sources close to the production company Freemantle confirm to FQMagazine that the necessary paperwork for the “dismissal” of the judge, songwriter and popularizer is currently being prepared. Will it really be like that?
Morgan leaving X Factor? Déjà-vu. Sources close to the production company Fremantle confirm a FQMagazine that in these hours the necessary documents for the “dismissal” of the juror, songwriter and popularizer. Various proverbs could be used (so much did it thunder that it rained, so much does the cat go into the lard…), the smell of departure was in the air, even more pervasive after the interview that the songwriter gave fan page this morning, November 19th. Speak in the past, Marco Castoldi: “I went there to revive the fortunes of a program that was dying and that was my function to analyze why it was that way. It was very clear that the reason people were no longer interested was because interest in the music and the quality of commentary and discussion about the music had declined.”
In orderalthough he briefly points out that “it was a very technically demanding work of repertoire selection, which led not only me but also everyone else to assign very important and very profound pieces, representative of ideas, even politically, historically significant. “such as from Gaber to Skiantos, from Bizet’s Carmen to Jacques Brel and Battiato, from Otis Redding to Sting. Is the repertoire sufficient if there are no talents who can “support” it? No. And above all: Does such a discussion make sense if the jury and a juror are always the focus? NO. Aside from that, Castoldi criticizes the excessive presence of brands in the form of product placement (Answering a question that, again and without being Tom Ponzi, smacks of “Until next time, lots of love”) and is “What were you planning to do?” What couldn’t you do?“): One wonders how he thinks they pay his fee, but perhaps one day he will explain it to us.
Morgan is right, he has brought the show back to the center of small debates on television. It was actually called an enzyme to draw attention to a dead and dead program he has done his. Except that the last has become life a Morgan show and Maybe it was a little too much: Morgan and the offside with Ambra (finally a few tracks from this mummy format), Morgan tells Fedez that he is “too depressed” (only to apologize later), Morgan pushes her Without even a touch of elegance, the stoic Francesca Michielin, while Morgan argues with Dargen D’Amico as if he were on the porch of his house.
Everything social media needs to talk about it, the newspapers need the headline, the show needs to get a few more viewers. So why go? Why is the measure full? Let’s go back to Proverbs. Why was it written like that? Because some of the colleagues are so fed up that they said “either me or him” and all in all: Better one less Morgan than a huge mess like the moderator’s departure or whatever? In the meantime, here’s another indiscretion, and that too is a show. While we wait for rejection, we enjoy the joy of seeing that something we learned in high school, enzymes that speed up biological reactions without being changed, can also be found in nature, and in the subject that Morgan mentioned X factr, attracted attention and accelerated the process of consciousness: If it’s a dead program without him, then why?