Jon Hamm and Anna Osceola tied the knot in the same Northern California location where the couple filmed the 2015 finale of the “Mad Men” series.

The Hollywood couple shared a passionate kiss in front of wedding guests including Paul Rudd, Larry David, Tina Fey, Brooke Shields, Billy Crudup and John Slattery.

The wedding took place just before sundown on Saturday in stunning Anderson Canyon in Big Sur, California.

It’s an important place because that’s where the series ended when Hamm’s character, Don Draper, rediscovered himself. The final shot of the series shows him smitten by the iconic Hilltop Coke commercial.

Jon Hamm and Anna Osceola tied the knot in the same Northern California location where the couple filmed the 2015 finale of the “Mad Men” series

The wedding took place just before sundown on Saturday at Anderson Canyon in Big Sur, California

The Hollywood couple shared a passionate kiss in front of wedding guests including Paul Rudd, Larry David, Tina Fey, Brooke Shields, Billy Crudup and John Slattery

The site served as a fictional hippie-style retreat in the final installment of the iconic 2015 series Mad Men, starring Jon as his iconic character, Don Draper, and Anna as a receptionist at a retreat where Draper lives lived.

The place where they got married is just north of the real-world retreat of the Esalen Institute, which served as inspiration for the Mad Men finale.

The wedding was attended by around 100 guests, including Jon’s Mad Men co-star John Slattery, who was once spotted sipping a Mad Men-style cocktail.

Other guests included Jon’s longtime friend Ant-Man star Paul Rudd, Billy Crudup, who is appearing with Jon in the upcoming new season of The Morning Show, and Tina Fey, who is starring with John on her TV show 30 Rock “ occurred.

Before Anna arrived to walk down the aisle, Paul snapped photos of Jon on his phone while the friends smiled and laughed.

Anna walked down the aisle in an elegant wedding dress that showed off her stunning figure

When Anna went to live with her future husband, musicians played the 1960s theme of the James Bond film You Only Live Twice, to match Jon’s 1960s Mad Men

At the end of the ceremony, Jon broke a glass with his foot, then he and Anna shared a kiss

Jon then watched in awe as Anna was led down the aisle in an elegant wedding dress that showed off her stunning figure.

When Anna went to her future husband, musicians played the 1960s theme of the James Bond film You Only Live Twice to match Jon’s 1960s Mad Men.

After a few words from the wedding guest, Anna delivered an impassioned speech, seemingly pointing to the location where the Mad Men finale was filmed, while the guests clapped and smiled.

At the end of the ceremony, Jon broke a glass with his foot, then he and Anna shared a passionate kiss.

They walked back down the aisle while onlookers threw rice, and the newlyweds shared multiple kisses.

Hamm played protagonist Don Draper in the AMC series, while Osceola starred as Clementine, a receptionist who worked at a retreat Don attended in one episode

Reports of Jon and Anna’s romance first surfaced in May 2020

Hamm and Osceola got engaged earlier this year and tied the knot on Saturday

The couple left the festivities for about 30 minutes to have photos taken while guests were served more drinks at a makeshift bar.

The couple then returned to mingle with guests before moving to a purpose-built marquee to continue the festivities.

Before that, guests arrived at the venue around 6 p.m. and were greeted with live music and champagne.

Jon and Anna are believed to have stayed at the nearby Big Sur Inn.

Jon and Anna are believed to have stayed at the nearby Big Sur Inn

Hamm and Osceola first met while working on the series finale of Mad Men, which aired in 2015.

Hamm played the protagonist Don Draper in the AMC series, while Osceola appeared in an episode last season as Clementine, a receptionist who works at a retreat Don attended.

The actor previously had a long-term relationship with Jennifer Westfeldt that began in 1997 and lasted almost two decades before they split in 2015.

The ‘Baby Driver’ actor was spotted with Osceola in 2017 and the two have been confirmed to have been dating since 2020.

Hamm and Osceola made their red carpet debuts in 2022 and also appeared side by side in the crime comedy Confess, Fletch, which premiered that year.

It was confirmed that the happy couple got engaged last February and told Us Weekly a source was told about the new step in their relationship.

Hamm previously discussed his romance in an interview on The Howard Stern Show, in which he expressed that his relationship with Osceola caused him to re-evaluate his love life up to that point.

The Mad Men series changed Hamm’s life in many ways. This not only brought him into the limelight and helped the actor to achieve a great career, but also brought his future wife into his life.

Jon, 52, met Anna Osceola, 35, eight years ago when she appeared as a receptionist on an episode of the popular AMC show.

Jon was in a loving relationship with actress Jennifer Westfeldt when their paths first crossed – but just months after meeting Anna, news broke online that he and Jennifer had split after a whopping 18 years together had.

The series “Mad Men” not only helped the actor to achieve a great career, but also brought his future wife Anna Osceola into his life. You can be seen on the show

Jon, 52, met Anna Osceola, 35, eight years ago when she appeared as a receptionist on an episode of the popular AMC show

In 2010, while still dating Jennifer, Jon first revealed that neither he nor his girlfriend were interested in tying the knot.

“I don’t have the marriage chip and none of us have the best examples of marriage in our families,” he told Parade.

While no one believed at the time that his “Mad Men” co-star had anything to do with him and Jennifer’s split, years later, when he and Anna entered a romantic relationship, the suspicious timing had some people wondering: Did Anna have anything to do with it to do with the dissolution of Jon? and Jennifer’s romance?

Whether or not Anna had any bearing on the breakup, it was clear that she and Jon had a strong bond, as they ended up falling madly in love – albeit many years later.

Reports of Jon and Anna’s romance first surfaced in May 2020, and soon after it was revealed around the internet that they were dating, the pair quickly began flaunting their love for the whole world to see.

They’ve been spotted packing on the PDA, jetting off on lavish getaways together, and attending red carpet events side by side — and Anna even managed to change the actor’s negative view of marriage.

Jon previously admitted he had no interest in ever walking down the aisle, but in a 2022 interview with Sirius XM, he revealed everything changed when Anna came into his life.

Whether or not Anna had any bearing on the breakup, it was clear that she and Jon had a strong bond, as they ended up falling madly in love

Jon and Jennifer (seen in 2015) split in September 2020

He credited her with inspiring him to pursue therapy for the trauma he suffered as a child following the death of his mother – which ultimately gave him a new impetus to become a family man.

‘[I’m in] Another place in my life where I feel very comfortable and at ease. “I’m in a relationship right now and it’s comfortable,” he said.

The star added that he’s recently focused on improving his mental health and substance abuse issues through therapy – after years of struggling with the trauma he experienced as a child after losing his mother to colon cancer at the age of 10 had.

He said that seeking professional help “opens up the possibility, for example, of getting married and having children.”

‘I’ve really been thinking about all of these things, it’s made the relationship I’m in now even more meaningful and opened up opportunities for me to do things like get married, have children, define a new version of happiness, life, well-being,’ he continued then.

“It sounds cheesy and whatever, but it’s real and, to put it better, it’s what I work for.” What else is there?

Comment on this storyComment

RIGA, Latvia — Before Wagner’s mercenary boss Yevgeny Prigozhin sent his private army on Moscow this weekend, he told Russians that for the country to stand a chance of winning its war in Ukraine, it had to become a “North Korea-like” state the death penalty in force.

Yet whatever Prigozhin hoped to achieve with the short-lived rebellion, he probably had no intention of being exiled to Belarus, an even more isolated dictatorship than Russia, often referred to as the North Korea of ​​Europe, and which he is now expected to follow in a deal around arrest and avoid prosecution.

At the end of his ill-fated “Justice March” on Sunday, Prigozhin, the 62-year-old chief known as “Putin’s cook” because of the government catering deals that made him wealthy, was still alive and smiling as he passed the Sued left the city of Rostov-on-Don and not in prison – a far better fate than many Russian observers had predicted for him. Literally, he had survived to fight another day.

Beginning Friday night, in one of the most remarkable 24 hours in modern Russian history, Prigozhin effectively declared war on Russia’s defense ministry, seized a strategic military headquarters near the border with Ukraine, sent a convoy of militants toward Moscow and was labeled a traitor to the president Vladimir Putin – whose own authoritarian aura seemed significantly weakened after Prigozhin’s antics.

And for the first time, Prigozhin, who had previously sworn eternal loyalty to the Russian leader, openly disobeyed him. After long sparing Putin from his otherwise harsh criticism of the way Russia had handled the war in Ukraine, Prigozhin declared that the president had personally made a mistake by labeling him and his Wagner fighters as traitors branded and let the Federal Security Service (FSB) uncover a criminal case.

“As for the betrayal of the motherland, the president is deeply mistaken,” Prigozhin said in an audio message announcing the withdrawal.

“We are patriots of our Fatherland, we fought and continue to fight, all Wagner fighters, and no one intends to go and confess at the request of the President, the FSB or anyone else, because we do not want the country to continue in corruption , fraud and bureaucracy,” he added.

In some respects, Prigozhin’s brazen maneuver clearly failed – his uprising ended without overthrowing his sworn enemies, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu and the supreme commander of the war in Ukraine, Chief of Staff General Valery Gerasimov. Prigozhin had been doing this for months, berating them for being incompetent, corrupt and out of touch.

After a brief armed uprising, a mercenary convoy returns from Moscow

All along, Putin allowed the feud between the two fiefdoms to simmer without much intervention, in what analysts rightly predicted was a ticking bomb.

Andrei Soldierov, an expert on Russian security services and a senior fellow at the Center for European Policy Analysis, said Putin clearly sided with Gerasimov and Shoigu against Prigozhin.

“I think they are really happy that they forced Putin to personally intervene in this situation – he is no longer an arbiter, he is on their side, and they can remain silent and show that they are the professionals here waging war and hold out.” against the counter-offensive,” Soldierov said.

Whether intentional or not, Prigozhin showed that Russia is at war not only with Ukraine, but also with itself on many levels. Thousands have fled the country, either dissatisfied with the invasion or afraid to go to war to become, have fled. Others are in prison or living in exile for speaking out against the war or against Putin. And still others, like Prigozhin, supported the war but not the military commanders, who often seemed to screw things up – a disappointment that briefly raised the prospect of civil war in Russia.

Still, Prigozhin might have won some of his other battles. At least he didn’t lose his private mercenary army entirely, as the Kremlin declared that the troops involved in the rebellion would be pardoned. And despite his obscenity, brutality and criminal background — he spent most of the 1980s in prison for robbery and other crimes — Prigozhin won some Russian hearts.

“They tried to break up Wagner,” Prigozhin said, before announcing that he would turn his fighters, who were just over 100 miles from Moscow at the time, to “avoid bloodshed.” This comment suggested that his main motive for the uprising was to combat Shoigu’s Putin-backed demand that all private military formations (which are technically illegal in Russia) sign contracts with the Defense Ministry by July 1.

That would have given Shoigu full control of Wagner, and Prigozhin said he would not sign.

Under Prigozhin’s leadership, Wagner played a central role in the month-long siege of Bakhmut and claimed the capture of the eastern Ukrainian city in late May, marking Moscow’s only significant battlefield gain that year. To win, he used thousands of convicts he recruited from Russian prisons as cannon fodder.

After taking control of Bakhmut, he promptly withdrew his troops and turned the city’s defense over to regular military units. The weekend’s actions, in which heavily armed Wagner fighters seized military facilities, including an airfield, in Rostov-on-Don, did not result in troops being withdrawn from deployment at the front.

But after the departure from Bachmut, Wagner’s role in Ukraine – and the degree of its usefulness to the Kremlin – became unclear. Russian media reported that there was talk of turning Wagner into a military police force in the occupied Ukrainian territories to terrorize deserters and residents, hardly an honorable task for what Prigozhin had touted as the most effective and determined assault force in the war.

“He set the stakes very high and posed as the savior of Russia, but when the Ukrainian counter-offensive began, the army got by without him and Wagner was completely incapacitated,” Soldierov said. “At the same time, the Department of Defense said it was time to sign the contract and he felt like he was cornered on this chessboard.”

“Bakhmut is over, but what’s next,” Soldierov added. “Prigozhin needed to stay in the headlines, but it wasn’t clear how.”

To bolster his public image, Prigozhin embarked on what appeared to be an electoral spree, delivering speeches and holding press conferences across Russia, where he increased his criticism of the military leaders.

Analysts said Putin had no choice but to tolerate it, given Prigozhin’s pledges of loyalty and support for the war. Silencing him would have risked giving credence to Putin’s liberal critics, including jailed political opposition leader Alexei Navalny, who has long declared that Putin will not tolerate any truthful dissent.

For nearly nine years, Prigozhin had denied any connection to Wagner and sued journalists for investigations that proved the connection. But last year he came into the public eye when his fighters in Ukraine achieved initial successes in the first months of the war, while the regular army suffered defeats due to strategic misjudgments.

The Kremlin, which had also charred for years claiming that Wagner was completely independent of the Russian state, relied on the mercenaries in the toughest battles of the war, and Putin eventually publicly thanked the group for their accomplishments.

Wagner uprising anticipates Putin’s rule

But sometime last fall, as the regular army in Kherson and Kharkiv suffered embarrassing defeats after surprise Ukrainian offensives, Prigozhin launched a smear campaign against the top leadership.

His constant rants, criticizing the country’s rich and powerful for their perceived lackluster involvement in the war and denouncing major flaws in war strategy, angered many in the Kremlin, and his influence began to wane. At the same time, Prigozhin’s escapades increased his visibility among ordinary Russians and earned him respect from the rank and file, who found him an unlikely truth-teller.

At one point, Prigozhin warned that the war against Ukraine had backfired and that there was a risk of revolution in Russia.

On Saturday, Wagner seized key military installations in Rostov-on-Don, surprisingly without resistance from law enforcement or the military. Even more startling was the public reaction to masked and heavily armed militants who came to challenge the army and Putin: some concern but no sign of panic, and in some cases there was cheering and applause.

“I don’t quite understand what’s happening, maybe it’s all just a ruse, but the Defense Ministry is trying to portray Prigozhin as someone who is against ordinary Russian people, and I know that’s not the case,” Yekaterina said. a Rostov resident whose husband was drafted into combat in Ukraine told the Washington Post on condition that her last name be kept secret so she could speak freely.

“Of course, Prigozhin is not comfortable for them, he tells the truth about the rotten structure of the military and they should get rid of him, but I heard that Wagner fights well,” Yekaterina added.

Some Rostov residents interviewed by The Post said they didn’t care about Wagner’s presence in the city and had become used to strange things happening amid a chaotic “special military operation” by the Kremlin. Some said they stopped watching the news altogether.

In a video clip that has surfaced on social media, an elderly man began yelling at Wagner for disturbing public order while bystanders tried to calm him down. A 60-year-old resident of neighboring Krasnodar Krai, which has long been home to Wagner’s sprawling training base and private chapel, said he believes the group is fighting “for justice.”

“Wagner people don’t touch peaceful people,” said the man. “Prigozhin came to them because the Russian soldiers are not getting enough, because the conditions are bad and everyone is being sent to the slaughterhouse, and Prigozhin will sort things out.”

A year after Russia’s withdrawal, painful memories are waking up in a town near Kiev

What comes next for the caterer-turned-warlord is uncertain. Prigozhin remains subject to Treasury Department sanctions for his role as the owner of internet troll farms that have interfered in US elections. Wagner is still active abroad, particularly in Africa, where he is often paid to provide security for authoritarian rulers. Prigozhin has not yet been spotted in Belarus, where he is due to go under the deal brokered by the country’s powerful President Alexander Lukashenko on Saturday to spare him arrest and prosecution.

But in Russia he obviously found some recognition. Shortly after news broke of his bizarre deal with Putin, Prigozhin made a celebrity farewell as he left Rostov-on-Don in a black SUV. A group of bystanders clapped and cheered him, and one man ran to the car to shake the warlord’s hand.

When the local police showed up downtown after Wagner’s departure, a group of people blocked several cars, booing and shouting, “Shame!”

“The crowd got excited – those who didn’t have time to take a picture or say something made their way to the fighters,” read a report from the scene in the local online newspaper 161.Ru Rostov-on-Don. “People started applauding. The morning fear and anxiety turns into a celebration, with crowds of tipsy people waiting for the fireworks,” the report continued. “Thanks, Wagner!” A man shouted.”

Give this item as a gift

Understanding the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Check out 3 more stories

More than 100 million Americans were affected by an air quality warning earlier in June because of these fires.

Article written by

Published on 06/25/2023 20:32

Reading time: 1 min

Smoke from the Canadian fires is drifting to Europe. (ECMWF)

A cloudy sky is expected in France. Smoke from the gigantic fires that have devastated part of Canada has crossed the Atlantic and is expected to reach Europe and France in the coming days, according to simulations by the European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts on Friday June 23. According to Mark Parrington, scientific director at the Copernicus Service for Atmospheric Monitoring, the fumes could reach the coasts of western Europe on Monday, June 26.

In Canada, more than 4.6 million hectares of forest have been destroyed by the flames in recent weeks and tens of thousands of people have had to be evacuated. Several hundred fires were registered. As a result of these fires, more than 100 million Americans were affected by an air quality warning in early June. A few weeks later, these unprecedented fires spread to Europe.

view comments

Share the article on social networks:

Share :

• Share on Twitter

• Share on Facebook

• Share via email

• Share a link