Osasuna celebrated with euphoria the qualification for the Conference League, which combined them with the victory against Girona in El Sadar (2-1), but the inspectors, who have analyzed their registration documents for the European competition, believe that since then they have lost the Failing to meet requirements The UEFA regulations require “not to have been directly and/or indirectly involved in activities aimed at organizing or influencing the outcome of a match.”

The most recent Supreme Court ruling in the Osasuna case, which sentenced several executives after the current board’s lawsuit and revealed payment to players from other clubs for game purchases during the 2013-14 season, was pivotal to the decision UEFA to ban the Navarra club whose place would be taken by Athletic. Osasuna failed to save the category despite the illegal efforts of its leaders.

The Navarrese club now have the opportunity to urgently appeal the decision of the European body and later the decision to contact the TAS, but the reaction of the Rojilla entity after receiving the notification from UEFA suggests that the Navarrese club sees this very difficult to reverse the decision. In a statement from Osasuna, not only UEFA but also the Spanish association are accused. The template states: “The club does not share UEFA’s criteria. He will address the Appeal Committee and announce that he will fight legally to the last consequence to defend his rights”, and sharply attacks: “Strong with the weak and weak with the strong, the judiciary of UEFA did not want taking into account that it was the Spanish courts themselves who literally declared that Osasuna was the victim of the money diversion of some of its former directors behind the back of the highest governing body of the entity, the Assembly, and the club’s control mechanisms”.

For the current directors, chaired by Luis Sabalza, who took over the reins in 2014, denounced the previous rectors before the judiciary and managed to revitalize Osasuna, “the message that UEFA is conveying is undoubtedly counterproductive for football and its relatives Units.” Facing the risk of being punished by the highest European football body, they are now choosing not to attack corruption in the world of football head-on.”

Osasuna’s board of directors considers that the company’s image has suffered very serious damage “and that it has also been caused by the silence of the main Spanish football federations, including the RFEF.” leaked nationwide to certain media outlets and journalists to build a story that sacrifices the weak to benefit the strong.” It was leaked that “as early as the 7th, the day Osasuna found out about the start of the investigation , was categorically assured that the end of this entire process would be the exclusion of the Rojillo Club from European competitions.” The statement ends almost resignedly: “We are prepared for the worst, but we are sticking to the motto that we have been following over the past nine years helped to rebuild the club: Osasuna never gives up.”

The federation, in turn, expressed in a statement: “It is a shame, a lack of respect and a very serious action that the club intends to involve the RFEF in this matter, strangely, always in a subtle way, explaining the origin of the Problems.” Complaints, and it is extremely serious to want to make your dignified and amazing fans believe that the RFEF did not or do not support your club.”

“The RFEF has never acted as a private prosecutor in these proceedings because it has always understood and defended the need to preserve the club’s innocence,” the association adds.

You can follow EL PAÍS Deportes on Facebook and Twitteror sign up here to receive our weekly newsletter.

The outcome of a heinous crime in which a teenage girl accused of killing her child has just been found guilty of murder. Paris Mayo, who was 15 at the time, collapsed upon hearing the verdict.

The young woman from Britain, who is now 19, denied knowing about her pregnancy throughout the process, the Chron reports.

Their child, named Stanley, was conceived in the fall of 2018, according to the Crown. The accused, for her part, stated that she was not feeling well, that she had stomach and back pain.

Paris Mayo’s attorney asked her during the trial if she knew she was pregnant at any time before the birth of her child.

“No, I’ve always been afraid of the idea that it could be me. I never took a test,” she told the jury under oath.

The young woman gave birth to her child in her parents’ living room. “He wasn’t crying, he wasn’t making a sound, and his eyes weren’t open. (..) I panicked because he didn’t cry and I got very scared. It all happened so fast I can’t really remember it,” Paris Mayo said, according to the Chron.

“I just remember him hitting his head and it really is. When I untied it, the umbilical cord was around her neck and that’s where it snapped,” she adds.

“Stanley had fractured skulls. Did you do it to him on purpose?” advanced the QC. “No,” replied the defendant. The jury didn’t believe his version.

Paris Mayo would have put his foot on the infant’s skull on March 23, 2019 and fractured his bones. Then she put five cotton swabs in his mouth. Two pieces were found deep in the child’s throat.

She then put the little body in a garbage bag and left it on the family’s doorstep before they went to bed.

It was her mother who looked into the bloodstained pouch and made the gruesome discovery.

Kevin Costner’s estranged wife, Christine Baumgartner, is revealing the couple’s lavish spending and A-list lifestyle to earn $248,000 a month in child support from the actor.

Baumgartner’s most recent divorce filing from Costner shows that the Hollywood star earned exactly $19,517,064 in 2022 and the family spent $6,645,285 on expenses, excluding taxes.

She described how the couple “traveled the world in private planes, stayed in luxurious hotels and private homes” while spending $25,806 on boat trips, $21,807.67 on spa services and $542,303.47 on gardeners.

And even if she gets $248,000 a month, according to Baumgartner, that’s “less than what it takes to support the kids in their usual lifestyles.”

She insisted the true number was higher.

“As outlined above, the amount required to support the children’s current lifestyle is $332,264 per month, which is 60 percent of our family’s expenses,” she wrote.

Kevin Costner’s estranged wife, Christine Baumgartner, opened up about her husband’s exorbitant wealth and how they’ve spent thousands on their flashy lifestyle

Baumgartner’s most recent filing on her divorce from Costner shows that the Hollywood star earned exactly $19,517,064 in 2022 and the family spent $6,645,285 on expenses, excluding taxes

And even at $248,000 a month, that’s “less than what would be needed to support the kids in their usual lifestyles,” according to Baumgartner. The couple have three children together, aged 13, 14 and 16

She also demands that he cover 100% of her private schooling, extracurricular activities, and health care. Both she and Costner have agreed to joint custody.

The couple share Grace, 13, Hayes, 14, and 16-year-old Cayden.

“It’s important not only to provide our children with a warm and comfortable home, but also to instill family values ​​and gratitude,” she wrote.

Kevin Costner’s top spends for 2022

Aspen House cost: $1,964,294.95

Beach house cost: $1,178,147.16

Gifts: $830,504.51

Gardener: $542,303.47

Beach Club cost: $288,381.24

Housekeeping: $84,040.78

Golf and Club Fees: $34,434.90

Boat cost: $25,806.45

Spa Service: $21,807.67

Personal Trainer: $12,851.58

“I understand that based on Kevin’s income in 2022, the benchmark for child support would be $152,681 per month.”

Baumgartner presented extensive financial figures with her filing, which Costner’s accountant had made available to her.

They revealed that 2022 earnings of over $19 million included rents from his extensive properties. Family expenses excluding taxes totaled $6,645,285. And the star paid $3,665,459 in federal income tax plus $1,171,699 in California income tax.

His earnings included $2,312,458 in rent for his Aspen ranch and $503,000 for the rent of a beach club property — one of three properties on the Carpinteria lot, where the largest house was the family home.

He gave gifts worth $830,504, paid $24,375 for auto insurance and $25,806 for boating expenses. Also, $36,465 was donated to charity and $238,530 to medical expenses.

Carpinteria’s main house costs $1,178,147 to run in 2022, of which $150,590 goes to the “Gardener” section and another $273,805 to “Gardener Extra Work.” It cost $64,527 for cleaning, $188,290 for insurance, and $77,603 for property taxes.

Repairs and maintenance cost $153,929 while utility services cost $43,569. Despite Costner’s $250 million net worth, there was a $86,163 mortgage interest payment.

Records show that the Aspen site cost $1,964,294 to operate in 2022.

Expenses included: $91,999 for a ranch manager, $170,533 for other employees, $163,505 for insurance, $44,607 for internet, repair and maintenance of $331,057, incidental expenses of $124,017 dollars and $19,576 for cleaning. Another $459,000 was for “commissions” and $127,943 for mortgage payments.

Baumgartner described how the couple “traveled the world in private planes, stayed in luxurious hotels and private homes.” They are pictured on a helicopter flight together in Monaco in 2000

Records show that Costner’s Aspen estate cost $1,964,294 to operate in 2022. Expenses included: $91,999 for a ranch manager, $170,533 for other employees, $163,505 for insurance, $44,607 for internet, repair and maintenance of $331,057, incidental expenses of $124,017 dollars and $19,576 for cleaning

The couple had a private wedding at their ranch in Aspen, Colorado, in 2004

Also under the personal “profit and loss” section of the family’s finances filed by Baumgartner for 2022 are: $41,800 in groceries and cash, $34,434 in golf and club fees , $12,000 in hunting fees, $99,000 in cash, Christine’s Amex credit card expenses of $222,586, household help of $84,040, and personal trainer expenses of $12,851 .

Additionally, Baumgartner, 49, wrote enthusiastically about her life with Costner in the present tense to support her case for a privileged time for her children.

“In addition to our beach compound, our family travels several times a year,” she said.

“We vacation in the Caribbean and Hawaii and travel to Aspen several times a year, usually in the winter and summer.” “We usually host family and friends on our trips.”

Describing the Colorado property, she said, “Spreading over 160 acres, the Aspen property is truly one of a kind.” It is located about 10 minutes from downtown Aspen and is surrounded by a national forest that cannot be built upon.

“It has several houses and buildings, each with extensive individual characteristics.” In high season, the rent is $250,000 per week. The property has two large lakes and is equipped with a dozen ATVs and snowmobiles that the kids love to ride.

“Kevin told me he was once offered $250 million for the property. In any case, it is an exceptionally valuable asset.”

She also said, “Beyond travel, we regularly entertain family and friends at our home and often rely on caterers or chefs to prepare most meals.”

Costner has stated in court filings that his estranged wife refused to leave the Carpinteria home despite signing the 2004 marriage contract, in which she promised to quit within 30 days if they separated

And even if she gets $248,000 a month, Baumgartner, who was driving her Range Rover to Carpinteria last week, argued that her monthly alimony claim of $250,000 would still be “less than the amount it would take to to support the children in their usual lifestyle”.

“We have a team of staff to help us manage the demands of our large household and maintain the property.”

“Our two oldest children went to private school through junior high and our youngest is still in private school and we are generous when it comes to their lifestyle.” We are also members of several local private country clubs.

“I realize that our lifestyle is extraordinary. “I appreciate how blessed we are to live like this.”

Costner has stated in court filings that his estranged wife refused to leave the Carpinteria home despite signing the 2004 marriage contract, in which she promised to quit within 30 days if they separated.

“Christine has taken the position that she will not leave Kevin’s separate estate unless and until Kevin agrees to various financial demands,” his own attorney wrote.

The court was told he had already paid Baumgartner $1 million to fund a new apartment and gave her $200,000 in the early years of their marriage as part of the terms of the nearly 19-year-old’s tentative marriage.

Baumgartner’s new $248,000-a-month child support claim shows the Hollywood star earned exactly $19,517,064 in 2022

Baumgartner has backed down with her latest findings, claiming Costner tried to get her to reach for the money, thereby depriving her of the right to contest spousal support.

“I have no personal income or assets in my personal name other than a bank account Kevin set up when we married over 18 years ago and another account I had prior to marriage of less than $50,000 ‘ she wrote.

“I recently learned that without my knowledge or consent, Kevin deposited $1,000,000 into an account he set up in my name years ago and claimed that the payment was made pursuant to Section F.5.i of the premarital agreement.”

“Kevin is trying to force my acknowledgment that the spousal support limitation is valid by ‘taking’ these funds.”

“I think Kevin’s goal is to get me to tap into that money so he can argue that I waived my right to contest the prenuptial agreement.’ I can’t make that concession.”

In other filings, Costner asked the judge to seal the prenup “in light of the confidentiality clause.”

Leaders of 17 political parties in India on Friday agreed to form a united front against Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

Loose coalitions have been formed in the past, but not so many different parties have banded together nationally to take over the ruling party since the 1980s, The Indian Express reported.

“There will certainly be some differences between us, but we have decided that we will work together and work flexibly,” said Rahul Gandhi, a key figure in the Indian National Congress (INC), who was expelled from parliament in March for defamation.

The meeting was hosted by the Prime Minister of the eastern state of Bihar, Nitish Kumar, and was held in the state capital, Patna.

“Everyone agreed that we will all work together in the interests of the country,” said Kumar of the Janata Dal-United Party.

“There is agreement to act together, there is agreement to contest the elections together.”

Top politicians target Modi’s BJP

The meeting brought together senior politicians from a wide range of parties who are determined to deny Modi a third term as prime minister.

“If this dictatorial government returns this time, there will be no elections in the future,” said West Bangal Prime Minister Mamata Banerjee.

However, representatives of some parties sat away from the press conference after the meeting on Friday.

The Times of India reported that the Aam Aadmi Party will not join any alliance with the INC until it denounces a controversial central government regulation affecting bureaucrats based in the capital.

Meanwhile, the BJP dismissed the talks with the opposition as a “vain exercise”.

What next for the opposition?

The parties will meet again next month to formulate a strategy to defeat the Hindu nationalist BJP in the elections.

This includes fielding joint candidates in specific constituencies across the country to prevent the BJP from benefiting from vote splitting among opposition parties.

Kumar said the parties would also draft a joint manifesto outlining their plan for the Indian economy, among other things.

“Many hurdles must be overcome before a true opposition united front can take shape,” political analyst Arti Jerath told the Associated Press.

“But I think the pressures on opposition parties to collectively challenge Modi are very, very great, because for the past four years they have all been harassed by state law enforcement agencies and the BJP has engaged in policy with all of them to break it. “parties and harass their leaders.”

“Unless they collectively challenge Modi and somehow prevent him from coming back, they all know that this will be the end of the road for them because the BJP will not really allow any of these opposition parties, especially not to survive Congress”, he said.

zc/rs (Portal, AP)