Business News

Nikkei record oil price OPEC

Nikkei record, oil price, OPEC+

3 hours ago

Japan's Nikkei 225 breaks 40,000 for the first time as its record-breaking rally continues

The Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE), operated by Japan Exchange Group Inc. (JPX), in Tokyo, Japan, on Friday, February 16, 2024. Kosuke Okahara/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Japan's Nikkei 225 hit another record high on Monday, crossing the 40,000 mark. The index recently rose by 0.8%.

The benchmark index is on a record rally and has hit an all-time high for the first time in 34 years.

Both the Nikkei and the broader Topix were among the top performers among major Asia-Pacific equity markets. The Nikkei is up over 20% so far this year, while the Topix has gained almost 15%.

Strong profits and investor-friendly measures from the Japanese government have led to a rapid rally in stocks this year.

The broad-based Topix edged up 0.1% on Monday after breaching 2,700 last Friday and hitting a record high.

—Shreyashi Sanyal

3 hours ago

CNBC Pro: Experienced Investor Picks Global 'Glorious 10' Stocks With 30% Annual Gains Over Last 5 Years

Last year, U.S. Big Tech companies performed particularly well as investors poured into the so-called “Magnificent Seven” stocks: Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla.

These stocks — taken together — were responsible for much of the gains that pushed the benchmark S&P 500 index up about 25% in 2023.

However, veteran investor and trader Adam Reynolds looks beyond US tech to ten lesser-known gems in Europe, Japan and Australia.

This Stocks have a market capitalization of over $50 billion and have experienced a compound annual growth rate of at least 30% over the past five years.

CNBC Pro subscribers can read more here.

—Amala Balakrishner

3 hours ago

South Korea's factory output falls for the second straight day, retail sales rise in January

South Korea's industrial production fell for the second straight month in January, while retail sales rose over the month, according to data.

Industrial production growth fell 1.3% in January, from a revised 0.5% in the previous month. A Portal poll forecast was for a 1% rise.

South Korea's retail sales rose 0.8% in January after declining 0.8% the previous month.

—Shreyashi Sanyal

3 hours ago

CNBC Pro: Dan Niles reveals why he prefers the “Fantastic Four” and when the “AI bubble” might burst

Fri, March 1, 2024, 3:26 pm EST

Tech leads weekly sector gains

The NetApp, Inc. logo is displayed on the smartphone.

Igor Golovniov | Light rocket | Getty Images

The technology sector rose about 2.4% this week and was the best-performing sector in the S&P 500. NetApp rose 20.2%, leading the sector gains.

Consumer discretionary was the second best performing sector, up 2.1%.

Meanwhile, healthcare was the worst underperforming week so far, down 1.1%.

– Hakyung Kim

Fri, March 1, 2024, 3:01 pm EST

According to Citi, there is still potential for a stock rally

With all three major stock indexes posting their fourth straight month of gains, the question is whether the stock rally has run too hot and too fast.

But all in all, the bubble has not grown to enormous proportions, Citi said.

“The current stock bubble is not (yet) overly large in terms of price appreciation, duration, valuation or sentiment. Some argue whether it is even a bubble given expectations of strong earnings growth,” said Citi’s Dirk Willer. “We therefore assume that the market probably has further scope.”

He added that he remains bullish on U.S. stocks, particularly technology stocks.

—Lisa Kailai Han

Fri, March 1, 2024, 12:28 pm EST

US crude oil exceeds $80 for the first time since November, ahead of the OPEC+ decision

Oil rigs, also known as thirst birds, extract crude oil from the Wilmington Field oil storage area near Long Beach, California, on July 30, 2013.

David Mcnew | Portal

U.S. crude oil futures topped $80 a barrel for the first time in nearly four months as signs point to market tightening ahead of an OPEC+ decision on production cuts.

The April West Texas Intermediate contract rose more than 2%, or $1.78, to $80.04 a barrel, while May Brent futures rose 2.15%, or $1.76, to $83.67 a barrel barrels increased.

U.S. crude oil and the global benchmark posted a second straight monthly rise in February as near-month contracts traded at a premium to later months, typically a sign of a tighter oil market.

OPEC+ is considering continuing its production cuts through the second quarter and possibly the end of the year, three sources at the organization told Portal this week. Sources told Portal that the cartel and its allies are expected to make a decision on the cuts in the first week of March.

–Spencer Kimball

Nikkei record, oil price, OPEC+ Read More »

Arkhouse and Brigade increase their takeover offer for Macy39s to

Arkhouse and Brigade increase their takeover offer for Macy's to $6.6 billion

Cars park in front of a Macy's store at Bay Fair Mall in San Leandro, California on February 27, 2024.

Justin Sullivan | Getty Images

Arkhouse Management, a real estate investment firm, said Sunday that it and Brigade Capital Management had increased their offer for Macy's after the department store chain rejected its previous offer as too low.

The companies are now offering to purchase Macy's shares they don't already own for $24 per share, about 14% more than the previous offer of $21 per share.

The new offer for the company represents a premium of about 33% over Friday's previous closing price of $18.01 and values ​​the company at $6.6 billion.

“We continue to offer the company an attractive alternative solution by selling the company at a significant premium. “This would provide significant value and immediate liquidity to Macy’s shareholders,” Arkhouse said.

“Macy's Inc's board of directors will carefully review and evaluate the latest proposal,” Macy's said in a separate statement.

The two investment firms had made a proposal in December last year to acquire the shares of Macy's that they did not already own for $21 per share, but the offer was rejected by the department store operator due to concerns about the financing and valuation of the deal.

Like other long-established department store operators, Macy's has struggled to compete against younger online competitors or competitors with smaller brick-and-mortar footprints. This has given Arkhouse and Brigade the opportunity to put pressure on Macy's to explore a sale.

Macy's also faces a board challenge from Arkhouse Management after the investment firm last month nominated nine director candidates, including executives with experience in retail, real estate and capital markets, to the department store's 14-member board.

Arkhouse and Brigade increase their takeover offer for Macy's to $6.6 billion Read More »

1709516744 Trader Joe39s Chicken Soup Dumplings have been recalled because they

Trader Joe's Chicken Soup Dumplings have been recalled because they may contain permanent marker plastic

More than 61,000 pounds of steamed chicken soup dumplings sold at Trader Joe's are being recalled because they may contain hard plastic, U.S. regulators announced Saturday.

The Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service determined that the now-recalled dumplings, made by California-based CJ Foods Manufacturing Beaumont Corp. may be contaminated with foreign materials – “particularly hard plastic from a permanent marker.”

The recall came after consumers reported finding hard plastic in Trader Joe's brand products, FSIS said.

No associated illnesses or injuries have been reported to date.

Trader Joe's storeThe recall comes after consumers reported finding hard plastic in Trader Joe's brand products. Helayne Seidman

FSIS urged consumers to check their freezers.

The recalled 6-ounce Trader Joe's Steamed Chicken Soup Dumplings were manufactured on December 7, 2023 – and have lot codes 03.07.25.C1-1 and 03.07.25.C1-2 on the side packaging labels to recognize.

In an online notice about the recall, Trader Joe's urged consumers to throw away the affected dumplings or return them to any store for a full refund.

A spokesman for CJ Foods Manufacturing Beaumont Corp. told the Associated Press that the company was investigating the problem, which arose during the manufacturing process.

In an emailed statement, the food maker added that “customer safety remains our top priority.”

Foreign object contamination is now one of the leading reasons for food recalls in the United States.

In addition to plastic, metal fragments, insect remains and other “foreign” materials have also led to recalls because they found their way into packaged goods.

Trader Joe's Chicken Soup Dumplings have been recalled because they may contain permanent marker plastic Read More »

Change Healthcare hack paralyzes payment systems of all healthcare providers.jpgw1440

Change Healthcare hack paralyzes payment systems of all healthcare providers

The fallout from the hack of a little-known but important healthcare company is causing pain in hospitals, doctor's offices, pharmacies and millions of patients across the country. Government and industry officials are calling the attack one of the most serious attacks on the health care system in U.S. history.

The Feb. 21 cyberattack on Change Healthcare, owned by UnitedHealth Group, cut off many healthcare organizations from the systems they rely on to submit patients' healthcare claims and receive payments. The resulting outage appears to have no impact on any of the systems that provide direct, intensive care to patients. But it has exposed a vulnerability that runs through the entire U.S. health care system, frustrating patients who can't pay for their medications at the pharmacy counter and threatening the financial solvency of some organizations that rely heavily on Change's platform.

Change Healthcare is a giant in the world of healthcare, processing 15 billion claims totaling more than $1.5 trillion annually, the company said. It operates the industry's largest electronic “clearinghouse” and acts as a pipeline connecting health care providers with insurance companies that pay for their services and determine what patients owe. It supported tens of thousands of doctors, dentists, pharmacies and hospitals and processed 50 percent of all medical claims in the United States, the Justice Department wrote in a 2022 lawsuit that unsuccessfully tried to stop UnitedHealth from acquiring the company.

Citing internal company documents, prosecutors wrote that Change concluded that “the health care system…would not function without Change Healthcare.”

The hackers, a ransomware gang once thought to have been crippled by law enforcement, stole patient data, encrypted company files and demanded money to unlock them. The company shut down most of its network in February to recover.

The US prescription drug market is in turmoil due to ransomware attacks

Quantifying the impact remains a moving target, with the severity depending on how committed organizations are to change. But three senior officials at the Department of Health and Human Services called it serious.

Adding to the urgency, Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer sent a letter Friday to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services urging them to make accelerated payments to hospitals, pharmacies and other providers, who were affected by the failure. Patients can't get information about whether insurance will cover treatment, while hospitals struggle to bill patients and receive payments, the New York Democrat wrote.

“Delinquency is costing hospitals across America millions every week, and people are even struggling to get prescriptions filled at their local pharmacy,” Schumer said in a statement on Sunday. “That’s why I’m calling on CMS to use its authority to cut red tape and provide affected health care providers with expedited and advanced payments, just as they did during the coronavirus crisis.”

“We recognize the impact this attack has had on healthcare operations,” an HHS spokesperson told The Washington Post, adding that the agency is working with UnitedHealth to avoid disruptions to patient care. The incident highlights the “urgency to strengthen cybersecurity resilience across the ecosystem,” the spokesperson said.

Molly Smith, group vice president of public policy at the American Hospital Association, said Sunday: “In our assessment, this is the most significant attack on the health care system in U.S. history.”

At some point, Smith said, the association heard of hospitals that weren't discharging certain patients because they couldn't refill their medications. Much of this disruption is being resolved as healthcare providers resort to manual submission of claims, she added.

Optum, a health services company also owned by UnitedHealth, said it had set up a temporary relief program to provide cash to organizations whose payment systems were affected – short-term loans that would have to be repaid once Change is up and running again. A senior HHS official said the agency is working with UnitedHealth to ensure the program is effective.

A spokesman for UnitedHealth said there were no updates Sunday but noted it had brought in consultants and was working with law enforcement. Since the hack, UnitedHealth says it has implemented “multiple workarounds to ensure people have access to the medications and care they need.”

Simply switching from Change to another provider is sometimes complex due to contractual agreements and technical reasons, according to industry representatives and pharmacists. In addition to routing claims to insurance companies, Change also sanitizes claim information to ensure codes and other details are correct. Although some competing providers have created some alternatives, Smith says they don't have the same cleanup functionality as Change, and many providers receive numerous rejections.

“At this point we have very, very incomplete workarounds, which means the cash flow issues continue,” she said.

Jose Arrieta, HHS's former chief information officer, said the cyberattack was among the most serious in the health sector in recent years and follows previous breaches.

“The size of the attack doesn’t matter. What matters is the impact,” Arrieta said. “And if you have the wherewithal to target a Fortune 5 Companies…everyone in the United States, no matter what industry you work in, should take this as a warning.”

While training solo in southern New Jersey, Craig Wax said his billing was “backwards, upside down and on fire.” The doctor serves patients of all ages and accepts multiple types of insurance. He relies on a small billing company that uses a software provider based on Change's platform.

“We’re going to go paperless” — submitting claims on paper forms — “and hope insurance companies respond to paper claims,” he said.

Some of the most persistent critics of the U.S. health care system, such as the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons — which opposes programs like Medicare, the federal government's health insurance program for older Americans — point to the Change Healthcare hack as further reason for skepticism of the current payment model.

The group's chief executive, Jane Orient, said the incident “shows the disaster that can result from reliance on centralized networks and third-party payments.”

Medium to large hospital systems across the country were affected by the cyberattack to varying degrees, according to hospital groups.

The Minnesota Hospital Association said some of its members' billing systems were crippled, unable to process claims and receive reimbursements. The Change Healthcare hack follows another local cyberattack that hit a radiology practice in Minnesota.

“There is growing concern about the ongoing impact on patient care and operational stability,” the association said in an email. “This places a significant burden on the financial sustainability of the health system.”

In an update to its members scheduled to be released Monday, the association, which represents hospitals in Massachusetts, said many of its members had disconnected from all Change Healthcare systems after learning of the hack.

Hospitals are working to establish alternative payment channels with insurance companies in the state, the association said. “It’s another financial emergency in a system already struggling to stay afloat,” Karen Granoff, senior director of managed care policy for the Massachusetts Hospital Association, said in the update.

At the University Hospital system in Cleveland, the outage affected patients' ability to obtain prescription medications at retail and specialty pharmacies, although the hospital system's in-house pharmacies were not affected, a spokesman said in an emailed statement.

According to Mary C. Mayhew, president and CEO of the Florida Hospital Association, hundreds of millions of dollars in weekly billings have now dried up in Florida and the damage could soon reach $1 billion.

“These hospitals were basing their operations on daily payments for the care they provided, and that suddenly came to a halt – and we are now on day 11 since the attack,” she said.

A lack of substantive information from UnitedHealth made the situation worse, she added, noting that switching to manual claims submission or finding another clearinghouse were not acceptable solutions. The latter could take 90 days, she said, according to one of her member hospitals.

And while larger systems may be able to weather the crisis by tapping into reserves, Mayhew warned that most community hospitals are falling victim to an attack on a business entity which has created vulnerabilities through its market dominance.

“If you're a small or medium-sized hospital that's already struggling with a very thin margin and a difficult cash flow situation, that's disastrous,” she said.

Change Healthcare hack paralyzes payment systems of all healthcare providers Read More »

Judge rules against Corporate Transparency Act disclosure provision

Judge rules against Corporate Transparency Act disclosure provision

A federal court has dealt a blow to the government's efforts to combat money laundering, ruling that the Treasury Department cannot require some small businesses to disclose personal information about their owners.

Under a section of a 2020 law that took effect Jan. 1, small businesses must disclose details about their so-called beneficial owners, people who hold financial interests in a company or have significant power over its business decisions. The law, the Corporate Transparency Act, passed with bipartisan support in Congress and was intended to help the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Unit identify money launderers hiding behind shell companies.

But in a ruling issued late Friday, Judge Liles C. Burke of the U.S. District Court in Huntsville, Alabama, sided with the law's critics. They argue that requiring business owners to provide personal information — names, addresses and copies of their identification documents — is an overreach by Congress, however well-intentioned.

“Congress sometimes enacts prudent laws that violate the Constitution,” Judge Burke wrote in a 53-page brief. “This case involving the constitutionality of the Corporate Transparency Act exemplifies that principle.”

Judge Burke's decision prevented the department from enforcing ownership reporting requirements against the plaintiff in the Alabama case, the National Small Business Association, a nonprofit trade group that represents more than 65,000 member businesses.

Lawyers who have been prosecuting the case in Alabama said over the weekend that they expected the government to quickly seek a stay of the injunction, either through Judge Burke or the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta, or both. The Justice Department will almost certainly appeal the Alabama case to the district court, lawyers said.

Morgan Finkelstein, a spokeswoman for the Treasury Department, said her agency “complied with the court's preliminary injunction.” She referred further questions to the Justice Department, which declined to comment.

While lawyers and transparency experts pored over Judge Burke's opinion, the immediate impact of the ruling on small businesses in the United States, which the government estimates at 33 million, was not entirely clear.

Companies were given one year to comply with the reporting requirements as these related to 2023, meaning the data is not due until the end of 2024. And Judge Burke's decision, narrowly defined, does not apply to small businesses that are not members of the trade organization that filed the lawsuit in Alabama, meaning most businesses affected by the mandate must continue to comply.

“This has only made things more complicated for many of my clients,” said Angela I. Gamalski, who advises large and small companies on compliance and regulatory issues at the law firm Honigman LLP in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Ms. Gamalski said some of her clients wanted to wait until the summer to deal with the reporting requirements and what they mean, since the filing deadline doesn't end until December and enforcement of the law appears to be in flux.

Advocates of greater transparency criticized the ruling.

“This is a dissenting decision by a single district judge in Alabama based on an extraordinarily narrow view of Congress’s constitutional powers that is unsupported by precedent,” said Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, the Rhode Island Democrat who was one of the law’s sponsors is. “I call on the government to quickly appeal to correct the flawed decision and ensure that the law’s transparency requirements can be fully and consistently implemented.”

Judge rules against Corporate Transparency Act disclosure provision Read More »

1709505561 Monthly subscriptions to print

Monthly subscriptions… to print

The American company Hewlett-Packard, which produces, among other things, printers, has great ambitions to market a monthly subscription for printing.

In an interview with the American broadcaster “CNBC”, the CEO of HP admitted that in the long term he would like to see consumers no longer own a printer.

An existing monthly subscription offered customers the opportunity to rent a print package with the home printer.

This amount, which could go up to $32.49 per month for printing 700 pages per month, allowed them to have original HP ink or toner thanks to the “HP Instant” software. Ink”.

Monthly subscriptions... to print

AFP

“Every time the customer buys a printer, it is an investment for us,” said Enrique Lores, reiterating that leasing represents a long-term goal for his company.

“If the customer doesn’t print enough or doesn’t use our products, it’s a bad investment.”

According to the businessman, the new monthly subscription service would provide a way for the user to print “according to their needs” by paying a fixed amount per month.

The CEO assures that he wants to increase the speed of delivery of products related to packaging in order to convince the population to change their consumption habits.

Monthly subscriptions… to print Read More »

Apple buys Rivian Nissan with Fisker The worries of Tesla39s

Apple buys Rivian? Nissan with Fisker? The worries of Tesla's competitors are triggering speculation

Apple buys Rivian Nissan with Fisker The worries of Tesla39s

Fisker CEO Henrik Fisker. Mario Tama/Getty Images

Tesla competitors Rivian, Lucid and Fisker were on the rise a few years ago. With growing investor interest, electric vehicle manufacturers had large market capitalizations and spoke of a bright future.

Today things look far less promising. The electric vehicle sector is facing a slowdown in growth and even market leader Tesla has warned of difficult months ahead. For its less established competitors, “challenging” isn’t quite enough.

Last month, Rivian announced a disappointing quarter and outlook and said it would reduce its workforce by about 10%. Its market capitalization has fallen to $11 billion from a high of $153 billion in 2021.

Gene Munster, managing partner of Deepwater Asset Management, this week addressed the idea of ​​Apple – which recently canceled its own EV project – buying Rivian, citing its low valuation. Apple “needs to move into a new market,” he told CNBC. “They need to do something big, and Rivian might be the answer.”

This would of course be an unusual step for Apple. Headphone maker Beats Electronics' most expensive acquisition to date was worth $3 billion in 2014. Amazon, which buys delivery trucks from Rivian, is the electric vehicle maker's largest shareholder, with about 16% of the hardest-hit shares.

Last month, Musk said of Rivian: “They have to cut costs massively, and the leadership team has to stay in the factory or they die.” He suggested the company had about six quarters left before going bankrupt.

A “general slump in electric vehicles”

Meanwhile, Lucid's market cap has fallen from a high of $91.4 billion in 2001 to $7.6 billion today. Last month it said it would only build about 9,000 electric vehicles this year – well below the 90,000 it forecast for 2024 three years ago. Its troubles led to speculation last year that Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund, which owns about 60% of the electric vehicle maker, would take over the rest. That didn't happen.

Fisker's market capitalization is $258 million, down from $4.1 billion in 2021. Last month, the company received a non-compliance notice from the New York Stock Exchange as its stock averaged 30 consecutive trading days closed below $1. And the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is investigating claims of “unintentional vehicle movement” in Fisker's Ocean SUV, which recently received a highly publicized poor review from influential YouTuber Marques Brownlee (aka MKBHD).

Portal reported this week, citing unnamed sources, that Fisker is in advanced talks with Nissan about a partnership – and a financial lifeline. Under the agreement, the Japanese automaker would invest $400 million in Fisker's truck platform and build its planned Alaska pickup starting in 2026.

“I believe we have a future – otherwise I wouldn’t be here,” said Fisker CEO Henrik Fisker told Yahoo Finance this week declined to directly address the Nissan matter. “And I think we'll be able to get out of this, I would say, general electric vehicle slump that's out there.”

Apple buys Rivian? Nissan with Fisker? The worries of Tesla's competitors are triggering speculation Read More »

Three passengers on Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 whose door plug

Three passengers on Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 whose door plug blew through are suing the airline and Boeing for $1 billion

Three passengers on the Alaska Airlines plane that was forced to make an emergency landing after a door plug ripped off mid-flight are suing the airline and Boeing for $1 billion, claiming the incident was caused by negligence.

On February 20, a complaint was filed in Multnomah County, Oregon, on behalf of Kyle Rinker, Amanda Strickland and Kevin Kwok, all of whom were aboard Alaska Flight 1282, minutes into a scheduled trip from Portland An unused exit door from the plane detached to Ontario, California in early January. Multnomah County includes Portland.

The lawsuit seeks both compensatory and punitive damages from Boeing, the corporate giant that manufactured the 737 Max 9 jet flown by Alaska Airlines, to be determined in court.

Click here to view related media.

Click to expand

“As a direct result of the horrific, fatal failure of the Boeing aircraft, Mr. Kwok, Mr. Rinker and Ms. Strickland suffered severe mental, emotional and psychological injuries, including post-traumatic stress, and physical injuries. The lawsuit states that the sudden change in cabin pressure “caused some passengers to experience bleeding ears.”

Jonathan W. Johnson, LLC, an Atlanta-based aviation law firm that filed the complaint on behalf of Kwok, Rinker and Strickland, said in a news release that it hopes to “hold Boeing accountable for its negligence, the extreme panic and “The explosion on Flight 1282 was called a “preventable incident” that threatened not only the lives of the passengers and crew aboard that particular aircraft, but also the lives of other Boeing-manufactured aircraft, which were later found to have similar defects.

The lawsuit claims the incident on Flight 1282 is “just one horrific chapter in the evolving story of Boeing and Alaska Airlines putting profits over safety.”

Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 took off from Portland International Airport just before 5 p.m. PT on Jan. 5, according to flight tracking website FlightAware, and returned safely to the same origin about 40 minutes later as part of an emergency landing. The plane was about six minutes into its scheduled flight to California and was flying at an altitude of 16,000 feet when one of the exit doors came off. A social media video obtained by CBS News at the time showed a gaping hole in the side of the plane, which was carrying 174 passengers and six crew members at the time.

Although the plane landed safely in Portland, several passengers suffered minor injuries and lost phones and other personal items that were sucked out of the hole in the plane. One passenger, a teenager who had originally been sitting with his mother in the row next to the affected door panel, had his shirt ripped off by the strong wind, another passenger, Kelly Bartlett, told Kris an Cleave, senior transportation and country correspondent from CBS News after it happened.

Preliminary results of an investigation into the incident by the National Transportation and Safety Board found that the plane was missing four key bolts that were supposed to hold the door stopper in place. The agency said in a report released in early February that “four screws preventing upward movement of the MED plug were missing before the MED plug moved up from the bump stops.”

Following the incident, Alaska Airlines and United Airlines canceled flights using Boeing 737 Max 9 aircraft as inspections began. Both airlines said they found loose hardware on landed aircraft of this model. The Federal Aviation Administration ultimately ordered a temporary worldwide grounding of all Boeing 737 Max 9 jets for “immediate inspection” and is conducting an ongoing investigation into the aircraft to determine what went wrong on Flight 1282 and whether Boeing “failed to do so “To ensure” that its aircraft “were in a condition for safe operation in accordance with FAA regulations.”

“This incident should never have happened and it cannot happen again,” the agency said in a statement in January. “The FAA continues to support the National Transportation Safety Board’s investigation into the January 5 door jam incident.”

Boeing is facing another class-action lawsuit filed by passengers on the Alaska Airlines flight that claims the Jan. 5 incident “physically injured some passengers and emotionally traumatized most, if not all, on board.” ” have. Alaska Airlines was not named as a defendant in that lawsuit.

CBS News has reached out to both Boeing and Alaska Airlines for comment on the recent $1 billion lawsuit. The airline said it could “not comment on the pending settlement or the ongoing NTSB investigation,” while Boeing said, “We have nothing to add.”

More from CBS News

Emily Mae Czachor

Three passengers on Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 whose door plug blew through are suing the airline and Boeing for $1 billion Read More »