The first hearing of the case against Eliana Michelazzo and Pamela Perricciolo, known to the chronicles for the scandal Mark Caltagironethe ghost friend of Pamela Prati. The ramifications of the case, exposed in the media, were followed up at the judicial level. Pericciolo and Michelazzo, the Sardinian showgirl’s former agents, have to answer for the crime replacement in the process resulting from the complaint filed by the mother and father of the child who would have been given face Sebastian, son of the stubborn Mark Caltagirone.
Wednesday February 1st, in the courtroom, next to the parents of the alleged fake Sebastian – represented by the lawyer Leonardo D’Erasmo – there was Eliana Michelazzo and her lawyer, Raphael Rivetti. However, Pamela Perricciolo was not present and was represented by her attorney, the Attorney Anna Beatrice Indiveri.
At the beginning of the hearing, Perricciolo’s lawyer stated, as reported by Fanpage.it, that she had already filed a lawsuit application for parole. That is, an institution that enables the accused in criminal proceedings to obtain a stay of the proceedings themselves, provided that they are willing to provide a service free of charge public service.
Perricciolo said yes and indicated his willingness to cooperate Green Cross of Fermo, in the Marche. The prosecutor opposed the request for parole. Now the ball goes to judge Paola Della Vecchia, who will judge what needs to be done. The process will continue with the second hearing scheduled for September 11th.
The protagonists of the process speak
Leonardo D’Erasmo, the lawyer for the parents who filed the complaint, commented on what happened at the first hearing. These are the words of the lawyer:
“Today’s hearing expressed Pamela Perricciolo’s willingness to resort to probation, an institution that allows her to make herself available for socially useful work while also staying the process. The judge who is currently reserved will cancel his reservation at the next hearing on September 11th. The prosecutor gave a negative verdict on the parole request, citing the lack of any attempt to remedy the damage suffered by the child and his family. If the judge grants Perricciolo’s request, his position and that of Eliana Michelazzo will be differentiated. For Michelazzo, who has not submitted any applications, the process is taking place. For Perricciolo, a journey begins at the Green Cross of Fermo. At the end of this period, a hearing will be held to assess the success of the probation. The question of refreshment depends on the will of the parties. When damage occurs, trying to fix it is always frowned upon. The public prosecutor complained. They should have already submitted a compensation proposal, which did not happen. Regarding Perricciolo’s application, I believe that it is a defense strategy, perhaps also a trial and avoiding all that it constitutes, including the pre-trial phase where summoned witnesses are asked to state the facts to their knowledge to represent.
Eliana Michelazzo, who maintains her innocence, spoke to the microphones of Fanpage.it and Talk TV afternoon five. He explained to the Campania newspaper that, unlike former partner Perricciolo, he made the decision not to file an application because he was sure he could prove his innocence. The woman claims to be alien to the facts. She emphasized this both inside and outside the courtroom, including at the moment when she addressed the parents of the allegedly fake Sebastian, to whom she provided the version of events that had already appeared on television and in the newspapers since the case broke were told.
“We are moving forward with the proceedings because we are convinced that we will obtain an acquittal. My client wanted to attend the hearing even though the subpoena order was incorrect. Despite this, he asked me for clarification because he intends to close the matter as soon as possible,” Rivetti, Eliana’s lawyer, told Fanpage.it. Pamela Prati’s former agent herself said: “I would have liked to have started today because I’m in absolute bottom. Pamela Perricciolo wanted to be tested, I didn’t. Ask yourself a question and give yourself an answer. I want to go to court to prove I’m innocent.”
Eliana Michelazzo: “Pamela Prati 50% victim”
At five in the afternoon, Michelazzo spoke again, stating she was a “very victim” in the matter. If asked if Pamela Prati was a victim, he replied: “50%”. Perricciolo? “I don’t think she’s a victim because as far as I know everything was made by her.”
Perricciolo’s lawyer, who was always contacted by the show, carried out Barbara d’Urso, She revealed that she had advised her client not to appear to avoid heavy media exposure, which could have damaged her image.