Wild Lucarelli he also takes it out on beasts. The columnist, who spoke on her podcast “Il Sottosopra”, does not like Francesca Fagnani’s conducting: “I waited for the end of this edition to comment because, to put it simply, I wanted to understand where to go It works.” And that’s just the beginning: “If you read social networks and websites, Beasts is the biggest televised case in human history. The day before it airs, my chronicle is inundated with shocking statements about Beasts, from people explaining one Francesca Fagnani being attacked and abused by people who say they like peas too much,” Lucarelli continued, referring to a confession by Bianca Balti.
Also read: “The Phenomenon”. Fagnani on the loose: the flop guest at the Belve
But for her, “Belve isn’t a program, it’s something between a regressive hypnosis session where people suddenly bring out what they had removed or hidden, and the shell of chi.” Hence the dig at the journalist: “We can say that Beasts is an interview program in which what is really wild is above all the ambition of those who run it. Fagnani is a journalist and what matters to her is not so much the program as a whole but enjoyable that it is “up to date”.or that his guests say something that is then relaunched by websites, social networks and newspapers”.
Also Read: Beasts, Red Light Censorship: What They Didn’t Air
In his analysis of the entire program, the columnist even goes so far as to state that “the interviewee is the least appreciated element, paradoxically: he is not interested in his story as a whole, an unpublished portrait does not come out. Above all, there’s the apparent urgency of the moderator to snap a catchphrase. In short, Beasts is a program designed for that strengthen the personality of the interlocutor: You go there to let the moderator win.” A real slam, but Rai 2 viewers disagree.