For a few days, those we had to call the new priests have been appearing.
Around the Roxham Road closure of course.
For years they told us, like theologians of “international law” or even “human rights”, the list of which grew longer and longer, without our knowing why or how, that it was not possible to close this path. It’s just impossible, they insisted.
To the right
The “law”, understood here not as a human reality and as a “social construct” like any other (unless the law is not a social construct, but then you have to explain that to me, because for fifty years that has been explained to us all a social construct), but as a transcendent reality would prevent us from closing the border and, above all, would force us to agree to the institutionalization of illegal immigration by diverting the right of asylum before a migration channel in its own right.
We were also told that illegal immigration does not exist, that it is even a theoretical impossibility. Those who dared to write this discredited themselves. Her fanatical immigrationism will have disrupted her most elementary intellectual milestones for a while.
Apparently, the impossibility of closing Roxham Road was purely illusory – one could call it naturalized ideological coercion. And the way could be closed. He was, by the way.
So our various priests just changed their reasoning: we could maybe close Roxham, they want to hear it, but we shouldn’t have! In other words, Roxham Road was a good thing. A treasure to be preserved.
And they are now mourning the lost of Roxham Road while at the same time trying to cripple us with a kind of humanitarian blackmail linked to tear propaganda.
They want us to believe that returning to respecting the border would shatter thousands of dreams, as if dreaming of Canada abroad is enough to have the right to settle there without asking permission.
The role of mafias and smugglers has been completely forgotten: closing this route would simply be a humanitarian scandal.
To avoid any misunderstandings, this is not to say that those who tried to cross the border illegally these days and will not be able to do so are not heartbroken. i want to hear it
But one tackles the problem by depoliticizing it and depriving it of its substance, forgetting that controlling migration flows is absolutely necessary for a state.
bribery
In fact, the Roxham Road was disastrous for Quebec, and its effects will be felt for a long time. It had to be closed. It is a decision in favor of our national interest in the most elementary, the most fundamental.
It is now up to us to see what other decisions are collectively necessary, but which we wish to portray as “illegal,” and how we can change the law to make them possible.
This approach used to have a name: it was called democracy. It was based on popular sovereignty. One sees in it today only the tyranny of the majority. Let us see in this contempt for democracy the hallmark of the secular progressivism of our time.
