1687594832 US Supreme Court allows Biden to prioritize immigrant deportation

US Supreme Court allows Biden to prioritize immigrant deportation

US Supreme Court allows Biden to prioritize immigrant deportation

The US Supreme Court has sided with the Joe Biden administration on immigrant deportation policies. In a unanimous ruling, the nine-member court ruled to uphold a Biden administration policy that had been suspended by a Texas court. These guidelines, issued in 2021, prioritized the expulsion of immigrants deemed to pose a greater risk to public safety or who were recently intercepted after crossing the border.

Republicans asserted that all undocumented immigrants should be deported and that prioritizing is illegal because it prohibits deporting undocumented immigrants. According to Texas and Louisiana, federal immigration laws require authorities to arrest and deport even those who pose little or no risk. The Supreme Court ruling in USA v. Texas recognizes that there are not enough funds or personnel to deport the nearly 11 million people estimated to be in the United States illegally and that firm priorities can therefore be set. Most importantly, states are denied the power to challenge these decisions.

“States have filed an extraordinarily unusual lawsuit,” writes Conservative Judge Brett Kavanaugh, who announced the verdict. “They want a federal court to order the executive branch to change their arrest policies to make more arrests. Federal courts have traditionally not heard such lawsuits; In fact, the states cite no precedent for such a lawsuit,” he continues.

“If the court were to give this lawsuit a green light, we could expect complaints for years to come about the executive branch’s alleged failure to enforce similarly worded laws, be they drug laws, gun laws, obstruction of justice laws, etc. . We refuse to pave the way for federal justice down this unexplored path,” he adds.

The ruling was approved by the Supreme Court by a vote of eight to one, although some judges support the decision with different arguments. The only opposition came from Conservative Samuel Alito, who was embroiled in a scandal this week for accepting luxury hospitality from a businessman whose case was pending in court. Alito interprets the dispute as a confrontation between Congress’ “categorical demand” that the administration “detain and deport” undocumented immigrants and the “more flexible policies” that the Biden administration is seeking.

“Today’s court response is that unless Congress can win a test of violence by withholding funds, refusing to confirm presidential candidates, threatening impeachment and impeachment, etc., the policy decision of the executive branch takes precedence.” , Alito notes in his dissenting voice. “Relegating Congress to these disruptive measures radically changes the balance of power between Congress and the Executive Branch,” he adds.

Join EL PAÍS to follow all the news and read without restrictions.

subscribe to

The government stressed that the law had never been enforced in the manner claimed by Louisiana and Texas and that there were insufficient resources to detain and deport all undocumented immigrants. He explained that the guidelines were only intended to give the 6,000 immigration and customs officials guidance in deciding which immigrants posed the most pressing threats.

The ruling is more important now that Title 42 has expired, the rule that allowed short-term expulsions while the pandemic health emergency was in effect. In July, the Supreme Court, by a vote of five to four, refused to allow the Biden administration to use these deportation guidelines while the judges reviewed the case. This left in force a ruling by a lower court that suspended its validity on the grounds that it drastically reduced the detention of those who, by law, were required to be deported.

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed with Biden and his administration on immigration issues a year ago, when it ruled that ending the program popularly known as “Stay in Mexico,” which forced most asylum seekers to have their applications resolved wait, didn’t break the law This is the case in immigrant camps across the border.

Follow all international information on Facebook and Twitteror in our weekly newsletter.

Subscribe to continue reading

Read without limits