Dado Dolabella, 43, is being asked by Rio de Janeiro prosecutors to pay nearly half a million reais in arrears or enter into an agreement to settle arrears. It’s about renting a penthouse in which the actor lived until his eviction in 2013.
Fernanda Tripode, the artist’s attorney, said she is waiting for the “judge to review the submitted petition with multiple motions, in which case an appeal will be possible.”
According to the prosecution available to this columnist syringes had access is from last Monday (17) and proposes an agreement to avoid judicial coercive measures such as the blocking of passports and driver’s licenses.
Fernanda Tripode explained that the actor was not aware of the bankruptcy proceedings. “When entering the file, I pointed out irregularities in the procedural acts and the subpoena and waited for the judge’s decision. There is no doubt that the plaintiff submitted false information in order to force Dado Dolabella to make the payments he believes are due, since he is known for his celebrity. The value is also discussed.”
Public collection is vexatious in character and prohibited in our legal system. Touting an alleged debt and forcing it to pay is an illegal act.
The attorney advises that the person should not be embarrassed or subjected to any type of embarrassment or harassment when collecting a debt. “You may not use debt collection, coercion, moral coercion, false, false/misleading statements, or any other method that embarrasses the person.”
Understand the case:
Dado has been in debt since 2013 for late rent on a 320m2 lot in Recreio, west of Rio de Janeiro. As of October, the actor owed around BRL 450,000 in adjusted amounts the amount could be even higher.
According to the court document to which this column belongs syringes Dado Dolabella had access to the apartment and added more than ten months’ rent to the apartment until he was evicted in 2013. The actor did not pay the debt.
The bankruptcy filing came after the judge failed to find any assets in Dado’s name that could guarantee the amount of the debt. The verdict was published in the Rio de Janeiro Official Gazette on September 28.
Civil bankruptcy is similar to bankruptcy, with the first bankruptcy affecting natural and legal persons who are not considered entrepreneurs. In addition, bankruptcy is characterized by a court decision when the debt exceeds the debtor’s equity.
With the recognition of bankruptcy, the debtors lose the right to manage their assets, which are now managed by the largest creditor. In the Dado Dolabella case, the judge appointed an attorney to act as administrator. He is responsible for managing any assets and representing the debtor in court.
Watch Dado Dolabella’s full statement through his attorney Fernanda Tripode:
Dado Dolabella had no knowledge of the bankruptcy proceedings. When we found out through the media, there was a corresponding manifestation in the records. I inform you that access to the process requires a password, that is, the media learned about it through the author.
When entering the file, I pointed out irregularities in the procedural acts and the subpoena and waited for the judge’s decision. There is no doubt that the plaintiff submitted false information in order to force Dado Dolabella to make the payments he believes are due, since he is known for his celebrity. The value is also discussed.
Public collection is vexatious in character and prohibited in our legal system. Touting an alleged debt and forcing it to pay is an unlawful act. Article 71 of Law 8.078/90 (which can be applied in this case) typifies the crime of unlawful collection. The regular exercise of a right does not allow excesses, that is, the recovery of an alleged debt cannot be carried out as carried out by the plaintiff when using media with a clear purpose of embarrassment, since this leads to a result that is considered unlawful, as provided for by Article 187 of the Civil Code.
When collecting debts, the person must not be subjected to embarrassment or harassment. You may not use debt collection, coercion, moral compulsion, false, false/misleading statements or any other method that embarrasses the person.
Such facts were also mentioned in the files.
The deputy has come forward and we are waiting for the judge to review the submitted petition with multiple motions. In this case an appeal is possible.