What Pallywood is and isnt The Antagonist

What Pallywood is and isn’t: The Antagonist

The Israelis call it Pallywood (Mixture of Palestine and Hollywood) the industry of dramatic performances produced by terrorists and Hamas allies, published by channels affiliated with the terrorist group and then reproduced by the international press (without identifying people and places, without verifying and monitoring cases ). and by antiSemitic, antiIsrael and/or leftwing influencers, leading to the excitement of naive audiences and the resulting hatred of Israel.

Does this mean that there are never any deaths or injuries in the Gaza Strip? Of course that doesn’t mean.

This means that only through direct investigation and independent investigation can we distinguish what is an act of a group that can do anything to exterminate Jews, and what is a real drama involving innocent civilians, including the dead and injured in explosions, their number and responsibilities also need to be investigated and investigated to avoid slander based on fake news.

On October 17, as the press rushed to reproduce the Hamas government’s narrative about the AlAhli hospital case, it had to shy away from evidence that would show that Islamic Jihad was responsible for the errant rocket fired at its base Parking lot exploded. Some media outlets, not all, published a retraction that does not remotely offset the negative impact of the original accusation, which spread in virtual bubbles around the world, that Israel bombed a hospital and killed 500 people. Three days later, the Press even attributed to Israel O “collapse“ of the church of São Porfírio, which, not by a miracle, stays in the same placeand the health unit buildings.

On Thursday, November 2, the news channel Gaza Report on X, formerly Twitter, published a Video whose content is described such as “scenes of chaos at the Abu Hussein Primary School (supported by UNRWA) in Jabaliya after it was apparently hit by a stray heavy M75 rocket fired in the final salvo from Qassam”.

UNRWA is the UN agency in Gaza that runs schools that have been criticized by Israeli authorities and also by the NGO UN Watch for instilling hatred against Jews among students. Qassam is the name of a Hamas military brigade that, according to the aforementioned broadcaster, is “apparently” responsible for the explosion, which is immediately attributed to Israel by the global left, whose activists have naturally angered the Gaza report.

“People criticize this account because it reports both the heavy Israeli attacks and the impact of rockets fired by armed groups in the Gaza Strip.” Registered the channel. “Trust everyone that after 23 years of bombings, the people of Gaza know very well what the difference is between types of ammunition,” he replied, defending his preliminary analysis, which was based on empirical evidence and had nothing to do with those carried out followed the distance.

The case still needs to be resolved, but a large part of the world simply does not accept waiting, puts every smoke signal in the service of its preconceived theses and condemns anyone who does not dare to do the same.

The idea that mass evacuation warnings and precision military efforts can prevent, but not completely prevent, the deaths of civilians when a terrorist group uses them as human shields while it kills and continues to try to kill civilians in the neighboring country is disturbing.

Therefore, allowing the reaction of a country in which 1,400 civilians have been murdered and 240 have been kidnapped only if it is guaranteed that no human shield will be hit from the terrorists is already hypocrisy, to say the least, given the persistent inertia of its population permanently at risk and the delay in neutralizing killers, weapons and infrastructure could lead to even more civilian deaths on both sides in future actions and responses.

Understanding the legitimate defense of a people and the military attempt to rescue hundreds of hostages does not mean granting the attacked country safe passage to indiscriminately murder civilians, but recognizing that the situations arising from the fight against Terrorists who even violate the laws of war require this to be analyzed case by case, keeping in mind that after a massacre there is neither a perfect solution nor an absolute consensus on the quality of any calculation about the hypothetical number of lives saved by fatal bombings gives. It is precisely for this reason that there is a legal provision that not every death of civilians is a war crime, given the scope for justifying attacks on highly dangerous terrorist/military targets.

The obfuscation of each episode from a factual, moral and/or legal perspective is of interest only to the leaders of groups like Hamas and their recognized friends on the global left, all of whom are authorities on the plot.