War between Israel and Hamas What post war scenarios does

War between Israel and Hamas: What post war scenarios does Benjamin Netanyahu foresee? Franceinfo

In a television interview with an American broadcaster, the Israeli prime minister says he wants to take “overall responsibility for security” in the Gaza Strip.

Destroy Gaza and after? The Israeli Prime Minister reiterated on the American broadcaster ABC on Monday, November 6, that “Israel will bear overall responsibility for security indefinitely.” The first lesson from this statement is that Benjamin Netanyahu has finally answered the Americans who For several days now, we have been asking him more and more urgently for a plan or at least a draft to end the crisis. Therefore, the objective was formulated, even if we suspected it a little, it is to take over security in the region.

For the former Israeli military intelligence officer Raphaël Jerusalmy, the Jewish state had no other alternative. “We have no choice,” he says. “We want someone else to deal with Gaza, I can guarantee you that, but in fact Gaza is an overpopulated region, very problematic, and that’s why no one wants to deal with it.” Benjamin Netanyahu tells us that there are no plans at all, to accept an international force with mandates that tie their hands. In the meantime, the Egyptians are completely disinterested in the Gaza gang, only the Israelis remain, with the disappearance of Hamas, as will Hamas as long as there is a repeat of terrorism.”

A medium-term vision and on the condition that Israel wins the war and eliminates Hamas from the Gaza Strip, which has not yet been won. Because when the Israeli army lays siege to Gaza City, the tunnel war has not yet really begun.

A West Bank-style profession or organization?

Assuming that Israel eliminates or expels Hamas from Gaza, two scenarios are currently on the table. First, the occupation scenario is not the preferred option in Israel because the word is scary and is used by Hamas to denounce the Jewish state’s offensive. And then Israel must provide itself with the financial and military means to hold the territory. This means more people need to be mobilized for longer, which has a significant impact on the economy.

The alternative would be a West Bank-style organization, modeled on the cities in the occupied territories. Namely administrative power in the Palestinian Authority and security under the responsibility of an Israeli security agency. In this configuration, the Hebrew state gives itself the right to intervene militarily at any time without being held accountable in court.