by Roberto Severoni
I wondered why Alessandro Orsini it is so divisive and hated by a large part of politics but also by public opinion which approves of peace but disagrees with what it says. The reflection came after the outcry triggered by the interpretation of the words sui “Children live in dictatorship”, from those who are for peace, as I said before, and who I discovered on Twitter. I found a huge amount of negative reflections focused only on this verbal passage, which is a simplistic decontextualization operation of the entire discourse, which has diminished its meaning. The whole speech is a reflection on what is a dictatorship What makes us happy, life is sacred but is Ukraine primarily a dictatorship disguised as a democracy?
It is clear that Orsini unleashes the whole faction when analyzing peace scenarios pro NATO and pro Guerra. Orsini challenges the dominant thinking of the prowar government: a government that simultaneously unleashes an operation of McCarthyism to those who speak of peace and begin to work in, confuse or goad public opinion.
The position of propeace public opinion seems less clear to me, as I said. The analyzes are a cold topic but certain passages are clumsy and can inspire misleading outrage. The analyst is the person who organizes information into arrays of possible answers. A mathematicalstatistical work related to his sensitivity. Mood and opinion are not recorded. Can you agree to a parable? It makes no sense. The only errors are statisticalmathematical. Have I analyzed all variables? Did I give each of them the correct weight? Have I developed all possible scenarios?
also read
Bianca Berlignür: “Orsini? I invite him because a pluralistic debate gives space to all opinions, Rai is obliged to do so. I haven’t heard from him on the phone for a year and a half.”
The very strong attack on Orsini is because he is one of the best analysts, because he is a professor, but above all because he can move public opinion, but the government and certain media are organized for war. Thus began the discrediting, bullying and cyberbullying action against him through the media and above all in every talk show, with constant interruptions intended to break the discourse and its logical sense, to steer it as far as possible into that morality, like I said it doesn’t make any sense.
Orsini points a possible path to peace, creates scenarios that can make this possible. But war is cruel, and to express it in terms of acceptable death toll, for example, seems like an exercise in cruelty.
But it is war that is wrong, not the shortest way to end it.
The Supporter blog contains posts from readers who have decided to contribute to the growth of by subscribing to the Supporter offer and thus becoming an active part of our community. Peter Gomez and the editors will select and publish the most interesting of the contributions submitted. This blog was born from an idea of the readers, keep making it your space. Becoming a supporter also means showing your face, your signature or your commitment: take part in our campaigns, remember that you are playing an active role! Those who wish to participate can also follow the editorial meeting on Thursday live stream for the price of “one cappuccino a week send us suggestions, news and ideas in real time and access the reserved forum where it is possible to discuss and contact the editorial office. Discover all the advantages!
Supporting means two things: it allows us to continue publishing an online newspaper full of news and insights, free for everyone. But also being an active part of a community and doing your part to continue the struggles we believe in together with ideas, testimonies and participation. Your contribution is essential. Support now
Thank you Peter Gomez
Support now
next article
We fold them
