There it is Conclusion so many Viewers they eagerly awaited. To dance starred couldn’t end without a contribution from Wild Lucarelli that this year, more than the others, has spared no effort. In this edition he triumphed Luisella Costamagna and Pasquale LaRocca. But this triumph was marked by many criticisms and doubts because it was decreed by a system of poll which was not entirely convincing.
Selvaggia Lucarelli and the long explanation post after Ballando
Wild Lucarelli wanted to comment on the entire season of the talent show with a very long speech that was published on his social channels. Could his peers be missing barbs and jabs? “I waited a few days before commenting on the most controversial finale in Dancing With The Stars history (and which saw me at the center of the argument) because it was Christmas and because I wanted to to calm oneself down souls a bit. Let’s remind ourselves that as much as we can get angry (and I was often pissed) we didn’t play that Nobel for peace (also because I’m afraid there were no candidates there). I don’t want to retrace the whole season, I’m just doing MY considerations why what happened happened.”
Read also> Dancing Sara Di Vaira angry against Selvaggia Lucarelli: what happened between the two
And then the torrent of words from Selvaggia Lucarelli: «I came to Ballando seven years ago. I saw how this was gradually changing and not so much because of the discussions (they were there before I arrived, remember Anna Oxa?) but how format. Caution. I’m not judging if for better or worse, it’s just a fact. Beside me, the snobbery about the discussions and the confrontation between guests or judges or competitors in the programs is pretty much on the balls. Because when there are heated but polite comparisons, we talk about it trashy? Comparison and difference thinking are part of life, they are interesting, exciting. “You’re a monkey throwing excrement!” It’s bad rubbish, yes, “in my opinion he danced badly” is an opinion.
The dance within the dance
And about the role dance plays in this show, Wild Lucarelli he said: «However, the program lasts four and a half hours. You can’t devote four and a half hours to dancing, that’s okay. Just to enrich it with stories, stories, relatives, mess. Allow the audience to know the competitors better, give color to the protagonists. Allow the human and dance path to follow. Initially – according to ME – there was a fair balance. I remember the very beautiful dances, the competitors saying the right things to each other, the technical part of the jury (Carolyn) that was inflexible in terms of steps and choreography.”
Also read > Dancing, the finale: Luisella Costamagna and Pasquale La Rocca are the winners
It still is Wild Lucarelli He explains: «Slowly I saw the dance more and more in the background, so much in the background that there is actually no technical jury anymore, Carolyn talks about everything but technique and sends Iva Zanicchi forward with flimsy reasons and boycotting others who interfere with the topic “Emotions”. The rest of the jury to my right is more or less behind her now (never understood why they consult with Carolyn before casting votes, bah). I, who was there to talk about things outside of dance, ended up talking about dance to balance the situation because otherwise I feel more like I’m on a reality show than a talent show.
«And here we come to the point – continued the journalist –. There would be a way to reconcile both, namely to talk about emotions, feelings, various bullshit and then to do justice to it to dance. For example, I always said I could find Egger built (the fiancée never mentioned turned up at the finale, you know) but I gave him very good marks and complimented him on the dance. On the other hand, duh. On the day of the final, Di Vaira dalla Bortone said that Lorenzo was very good, Carolyn was the one who had done the most difficult choreographies and who had never done anything wrong, but “she gave little to the program, she told little to the public » . Sore point: «Textual. Of Zanicchi They always said he was a showman and never that he danced badly. And these are indeed the words of the “technicians” (the elements of the program with the most votes available in the finale), but which now appear to be the words of a team of writers. So speak authors or people who make television, not those who should play an expert role. The “technicians” of the programin short, they have become everything they wanted to fight as dancers (cit) ».
Convenience
Lucarelli has therefore explained Anyone who needs television knows that a personality like that of Iva Zanicchi serves the dynamism of the program. However, everything has a limit: “Then of course it’s television. I Zanicchi in the final I can even understand (let’s do it in the semifinals), I’m not Snow White. It makes a show, it serves, it is useful, it entertains. And I also miss what we know (the insults, the jokes) because it actually works for the program and the ratings. But it’s not like keeping her in, you have to invent arguments, make mistakes and throw shit at others to make way for her in the finals. It’s not like you have to accuse me or anyone else of doing anything wrong to keep the card for them. Or prevent anyone from talking about themselves, then say “No Telling”. That is trivial».
The final
Lots Viewers I was upset to see Luisella Costamagna triumph. Also because the referendum had decided to let Egger win. The jury, however, voted en bloc for Costamagna, with the exception of their own Wild Lucarelli. «As long as he served in the Egger program, he was the best. Even when she was so-so, her flaws were invisible. Always emotions emotions emotions. When it was no longer needed in the final, Carolyn suddenly noticed the mistake. While I’m at it, I’ll say everything. Ditto for Ema and Angelo who were really adorable but technically Ema was one of the poorest. Always made basic choreographies so-so. But when the technicians and the entire jury say “Wonderful” for 11 episodes, you’re a little convinced of being at home. But, we said, it’s television. They were kind, engaged, romantic, sweet, they could tell a love story. There are. If it wasn’t for that, I would have massacred her instead of being lukewarm. Just as one says about a competitor for ten episodes (all compact) that he is “so-so”, albeit good, so in the end the judgments from home are so-so. «The final it was ugly and incomprehensibly unfair for various reasons. The mechanics of having a couple who got injured in the first episode back in the semifinals is very questionable, but well, it’s the rule.
In this case, Costamagna had danced a tango in the first episode and then three seated dances. I repeat sitting. The jury awarded it a 10, with an enthusiasm I found ridiculous and highly suspicious. That means the movements of the arms were coordinated and Pasquale around who was making the deck. It seemed to me that there was already an orientation».
«Do you remember someone who hit the dance floor with the swing? – continues Wild -. Which then is actually a dance where everything comes in a bit, no defined genre. In short, a couple who have practically never danced before returns to the finals with a dance style of their choice. There I understood that they would have won (but also a little earlier), so much so that I explained it weeks before on my social networks and in the newspapers”. Lucarelli added: «I didn’t say anything about the play-off that night because Luisella and Pasquale fought with Lorenzo and everything would have been interpreted as ‘biased’. So since Lorenzo was gone, I let him go and kept quiet. Then, well, the costumes, the music was crazy. Costamagna spirited, good, even if he’s done more or less 80 percent of what you see. However, they return and go to the finals. As an episode dance (which ALWAYS has to be a never done dance) they repeat a tango (which they had done in the first episode before the injury). Which wouldn’t be allowed, especially if a couple has practically never danced before, but they call it tango, I don’t know what, so it’s all worth it. Then a swing (always a dance ONLY for YOU) and the very cool paso of the first episode. They throw out Di Giorgio who had danced 12, they pass by almost a percent more votes, which we believe. At this point I would like to point out that victory is practically won after just a few dances. In this case, they came to challenge poor Egger, who had danced in all “Dancing with the Stars” 4 types of dance (standing, the seated ones were fluffy): tango, paso, swing and show dance (the last two are very “free”. ” Dances ” as a style)».
The conclusions
Therefore, according to Selvaggia, the victory of Costamagna and Rocca is sad: «But in the end I am not interested in the voting and calculation system. What interests me is that NOBODY had my reasoning, saw those mediocre dances at the end, that the technicians pretended not to know how little we saw of the couple’s true abilities. And in the end, that victory was sad for everyone, except perhaps the immense, paraculissimo Pasquale, who, with great cleverness (and a lot of production flexibility), managed to bring home the fourth trophy in three years. Luisella took home a bitter victory that didn’t please her and then there were a thousand reviews, codacons, articles that raised doubts, dancers and competitors who were disappointed (some said it publicly, others privately).
Will he stay in Ballando?
«Finally feeling that it was an incredible output marred by an incomprehensible infatuation of the program part for a couple with whom no one really fell in love. In the meantime, whether I stay or not, I hope that a To dance rediscover a little passion for dancing, as well as for stories, because dances are always more humble. And I, when I was a viewer of Ballando, loved the sca**i with oxa, yes they took up a good part of the episode, yes, but then I saw them dance and everything came back into perfect balance,” concluded Selvaggia Lucarelli.
Last updated: Monday 26 December 2022 20:54
© REPRODUCTION RESERVED