the Prince Harry it does not stop. After the publication of the autobiography “Spare. The Minor continues to speak its truth in interviews, in a controversial game between memories and hypocrisy, declarations of peace and acts of war, innocence and opportunism. Before him, however, is nothing but the deafening silence of Buckingham Palace. What if the Duke was destined to become a howler in a desert he carved grain by grain with his own hands?
Silence is the virtue of the strong
In interviews for ITV and CBS, Prince Harry claims he wants a reconciliation with his family, he has no intention of harming her with his memoir, but in fact he shied away from venomous barbs. An obvious contradiction to which i windsorSo far, they’ve responded in the only possible way: silence, true to the motto “never complain, never explain” that Harry so disparaged in interviews reluctant to participate in any way [in simili questioni]because… it fuels controversy and Harry has made so many claims that it is almost impossible to answer them all.” Also, “the Queen only replied when absolutely necessary and succinctly”. A response from the King and his Family would mean drawing attention to the Sussexes Here is the essence of the war of nerves the Windsors are winning so far.
A small crack in the wall of silence?
the Prince of Galles He wasn’t always confident in the family’s line of defense. As a source told Page Six, William considered responding to the Duke of Sussex’s revelations with a “statement” during a meeting in Sandringham last Christmas. As he did in March 2021 after the Sussexes’ interview with Oprah, when he saw fit to state that his “family isn’t racist at all.” Charles III would have protested: “No doubt there were apprehensions about what Harry would have written,” the insider said, but His Majesty chose to follow the traditional policy of apparent indifference. That doesn’t mean the royal family is passive in the face of allegations: as reported by Page Six and the Telegraph, Carlo and William have set up a real “operations room” at Sandringham to decide on any countermeasures, but only in extreme cases. However, the Sunday Times assures: “William will not retaliate, he never would, because he is [un uomo] decent and incredibly loyal. He’s an easy target because Harry knows he won’t retaliate.”
Will Harry lose the title?
An Act of Parliament is required to gain the title Dukes of Sussex to Harry and Meghan. It’s quite a complicated process, but not impossible to accomplish, especially when King Charles III. cleverly justified it in the name of his “slender monarchy” project. It would be easier if the Dukes gave up the title. During the CBS interview, Anderson Cooper asked Harry why he continues to use his title since he has retired from official duties and criticized the company. However, the prince dodged the question and only replied: “What’s that about?”. It would make sense, especially from a coherence and believability perspective, but Harry doesn’t seem to see it (or does he pretend to see it?).
Is Harry risking his visa?
In the request form american visa There is a specific question: “Have you ever broken any law related to possession, use, or distribution of illegal drugs?”. In his memoir, the Duke admitted to using cocaine, smoking cannabis and ingesting hallucinogenic mushrooms. For this reason, the press is wondering if, given this admission, his residency visa in the United States will be revoked. To better understand the question, we need to see whether or not the prince lied when answering the question about drugs at the time of his move to California in 2020. Professor Alberto Benitez, director of the George Washington University Immigration Clinic, has no doubts, telling the Telegraph: “If he hadn’t been Prince Harry but some ‘Fred Jones’ he would have been investigated and the green card would have been denied “.
All against the prince
“According to Harry… the newspapers made up a ‘distorted account’ of him and Meghan… during the interview for ITV [il principe] He has not given a single example of this … heinous behavior … I doubt he is aware that if he bans the press he will be banning himself as it is infinitely more offensive and less respectful of his family’s privacy than any newspaper.” , he emphatically told Stephen Glover in the Chron. Even Ronald Reagan’s daughter Patti Davies commented on the book’s release, advising Harry to “shut up”: “If he had taken the time… to think… he would have made a different choice… He might look back and regret what he did.” Davies knows what she’s saying: in 1992, like the Duke of Sussex, she wrote a explosive memoir, The Way I See It, which she later regretted. Not even the Brits would side with the prince That’s according to a YouGov poll Megan Markle won second place among least loved royals with 39% of preferences and the duke third with 26%.