The UK Parliament’s Intelligence Committee has nailed an open secret in a haunting report: “China has managed to successfully penetrate all sectors of the UK economy,” according to a long-awaited report finally released Thursday. The Conservative-majority commissioners have spent months questioning politicians, intelligence officials and geostrategic experts in an attempt to accurately portray Beijing’s interference in UK institutions.
“The problem we face has to do with the ‘everything is state’ strategy. [whole-of-state, en el término inglés empleado por la comisión] that China uses. Its public and private corporations, as well as its cultural and academic institutions, and even its ordinary citizens are all vulnerable to being co-opted (voluntarily or involuntarily) for espionage or interference operations abroad,” the report said.
The Tories have been at odds for years since David Cameron’s government failed to usher in a new “golden age” in Britain-China relations, which served to open the doors to uncontrolled capital and influence from Beijing should react to the growing power of the Asian nation. A powerful current within the Conservative parliamentary group, whose leading voice is former party leader Ian Duncan Smith but which has very bellicose supporters like briefly former Prime Minister Liz Truss, is calling for more clout in front of Beijing and for the name China than what they think it is, a “threat” to the UK.
Rishi Sunak, who was also in favor of using such a blunt term when he was seeking Conservative Party leadership, has begun to soften his approach once he steps onto Downing Street and understands what that is and the implications for foreign policy . In the recent revision of the Comprehensive Foreign and Defense Policy Report, which is published annually, Sunak uses the offbeat euphemism “epoch-defining systemic challenge” when referring to China. Later, in his ongoing attempt to mend Washington-London relations, deteriorated by Brexit, he used the term threat to please the Joe Biden government, which is openly hostile to Beijing. But always with the subsequent nuances to mitigate the criticism.
China’s immersion in Britain
“It is clear that China has exploited the policies of successive British governments aimed at strengthening economic ties between the two countries, advancing its commercial, scientific, technological and industrial goals and gaining a strategic advantage,” the statement said Commission States. Parliamentarian in her conclusions. “China has bought and gained control or influence in the UK energy and industrial sectors. And until the Covid-19 pandemic, Chinese money was accepted by Her Majesty’s Government without asking too many questions.
Join EL PAÍS to follow all the news and read without restrictions.
subscribe to
Faced with the most obvious and obvious conclusion – China’s increasing superiority and expansion in the economic and industrial spheres – the members of the commission emphasize the way Beijing has worked to dominate the academic world as well and the advantages it has achieved with this strategy, both in terms of political influence and economic advantage. By funding university facilities; of incentives [se entiende que económicos] or intimidation of academics; or by monitoring and controlling the thousands of Chinese students who populate UK campuses, Beijing manages to “control the narrative of the debate,” says the commission.
In addition, through the UK government’s non-bureaucratic involvement in funding and collaboration in university research, Beijing is forcing the sharing of information and data and the acquisition of intellectual property rights, the commission said. “The various government departments still do not understand the need to develop a plan to respond. And meanwhile, China has an opportunity to gather and capitalize on the achievements of Britain’s best and brightest,” the report said.
The report relates to Boris Johnson’s government’s protracted decision to ban Chinese telecoms giant Huawei from Britain’s development of 5G technology. In 207 pages, the commission accused Downing Street of short-termism and long prioritized the economic prospects that opened the doors to China, given the geostrategic challenge it posed. “The resources made available to counter this threat have been totally inadequate and the slowness with which these response strategies have been implemented leaves a lot to be desired,” the MEPs complain.
Sunak received a report a month ago that the commission had been working on for four years, and some conservative conservatives in the party accused him of delaying publication in an attempt to avoid the issue.
Follow all international information on Facebook and Twitteror in our weekly newsletter.
Subscribe to continue reading
Read without limits