“There is no such thing as a family destroyer, families ruin themselves and then you blame the highlighter that doesn’t ruin anything.” So Antonio Ricci returns to the case of Andrea Giambruno, guest of “Un Giorno da Pecora” on Radio1.
Did the riots cause the crisis or did they become an excuse? “It is an interesting question to know whether Striscia was the occasion for which I demanded Meloni’s thanks or whether the family script was destined to continue. I don’t have a clear idea, I’m waiting for the situation to calm down.” ” Has Giorgia Meloni called you? “No, not for the time being. She has to thank me because, in my opinion, I gave her a good ride to get out of one “I’ve never seen anything like this before…” he says, referring to the content of the videos broadcast.
The outsiders document Giambruno’s behavior in the “Diario del giorno” studio: “I’ve never seen anything like that. I felt and knew that something like this was happening in the editorial offices, as journalists had told me. For us in Striscia, respect is sacred for showgirls, something like that would be a horror to see.
“I am convinced that certain positions have been strengthened, such as Giambruno’s. When Giambruno speaks, Samson will die with all the Philistines… By cutting off his forelock, he sent a biblical sign: After the age of whitewashed tombs, Samson concludes that despite the cut off forelock, he has the power, along with everyone Philistines to die. When Giambruno speaks, it’s chaos. He still comes out of this stronger. Anyone who has fans and followers will certainly have many. I would take him Strip? No, I would say no. I would let him and Meloni build the “Meloni House”… Think of Giambruno’s poor life, she took him to see shows by Pino Insegno or Pio and Amedeo: everyone would have rebelled.” .
The Prime Minister announced the break with Giambruno with a post: “The situation is still confused, ongoing. There are fixed points, the message is omitted: the girls who witnessed this exuberance were not remembered.”
We talk about the timing of the operation: “The outcasts were received in June, corresponding to the accident in Casalpalocco. I saw her at the end of September when Striscia started again. I didn’t air it straight away because I thought that was how it was.” “A gentleman could still give pleasure.” He didn’t. In the second outburst, someone warned him, “Be careful with Striscia…”. From then on he may have been very cautious. When I saw his photo of Chi on the cover, I decided it was the right moment. I understand that Mediaset’s top management knew nothing about this whole thing. Many are wondering why no one intervened between the first and second broadcasts. “They didn’t call me after the first broadcast. In Striscia there is a Mediaset producer and I am there, we create the program that does not have to commit crimes. Who can come and accuse me of a crime? There is.” a sentence from the European Court of Human Rights, according to which I am a “delightful person”… It is actually handwritten after the sentence…).
Mediaset’s top management “can be informed by the Mediaset producer. It’s about not informing the producer about what is being done…”. Did you keep this point of the lineup hidden? “Exactly. I have a piece of paper with some news written on it. A nice report from Luca Abete, which could have been there anyway…”. What would have happened if the producer Mediaset had known about it? “He would have tried to intervene. However, my contracts provide for complete freedom. But there would have been scenes where people threw themselves on the floor… I don’t want to get to the point of saying, ‘I’ll do that.’ “It’s on principle”, a terrible phrase…”.