Continue the discussion Pandoro Gatethe case that has recently attracted the most intense criticism and involves Chiara Ferragni. The digital entrepreneur never revisited the matter, limiting herself to posting an apology video before attempting to resume her usual life of commitments and social media. However, in a statement issued directly by her company, she made it clear that she was prepared to explain her version of events only to those responsible. In the last few weeks many have expressed their opinion on this topic and now too Elena Casalegno he wanted to have his say. The presenter did not address the merits of the legal matter, but wanted to express her thoughts bluntly in a lengthy interview granted to AdnKronos.
The thoughts of Elenoire Casalegno
“But what a miscommunication.” These were the first words that Casalegno dedicated to the Pandoro case, when he commented on the apology video that the Cremonese influencer published on social media immediately after the news broke and caused a great stir: “If When you sign a contract with a company, you know what your fee is and do you also know that the company voluntarily donated 50,000 euros to Regina Margherita six months previously? So What would be the communication error?“Elenoire continued.
“If there is a company that produces, it is obvious that if you offer your image to that company and get paid for it beyond the charity, you are also working. When Ferragni runs an advertising campaign, she is free to ask for what she wants, and if there is a company that will pay her, then so be it. But here There are some ambiguities Because then when you make stories or posts on social media inviting people to buy this Pandoro to participate in a charity project, then the question becomes unclear,” he added. Finally, the side swipe: “You yourself admitted that you are an entrepreneur and that an entrepreneur knows how to move.” She is not a beginner girl. We Italians have weak memories, we are people that we forget easily, for better or worse, but when it comes to charity and children we are very strict judges and do not forgive. In my opinion, Chiara should have just been herself in the apology video, she made a mistake there too, maybe it would have been better if she had written an apology letter, that would have been more effective.
The moderator's criticisms
As expected, Elenoire did not want to go into the merits of the legal proceedings, but she could not help but comment on Chiara Ferragni's behavior: “I don't know how it will turn out, she certainly can't disappear.” His entire life takes place on social media. He was right to remain silent, now we have to see how he can rebuild his image, but in my opinion he will get out of this.” And again he thundered, almost as if he wanted to take another swipe at the influencer's head throw: “You can make mistakes in life, the important thing is that your remorse is sincere.” Mistakes cannot be paid for with money“.
Regarding the angry media attention given to the 36-year-old, Casalegno clarified: “It's true, but we have to remember that she lived angry on social media, so it's normal for people to talk about her , for the better.” and for the worst. Bad”. And again, there is also room for Ferragni's decisions that Elenoire does not share; particularly the overexposure of the children Leone and Vittoria as well the display of his wealth: “It's a matter of good taste, showing off is, at least the way I was raised, a symptom of rudeness, it's vulgar because you never know who is in front of you or who is following you.” I don't agree with it either , showing children too much. I never showed my daughter, some people didn't even know that I had a daughter.” Then the bitter conclusion: “The world of the Internet is beautiful, but full of pitfalls, for years the postal police have been asking you not to take photos and videos of minors “Everyone who works on the Internet knows exactly what pitfalls there are. There are pedophiles, haters and what do you do? Instead of protecting your children, do you feed them to these people?“.