Beijing unleashed a attack In the Born – and especially to the Great Britain – in response to the UK Foreign Secretary’s comments, Liz Truss, on the importance of a global perspective for the Atlantic Alliance. With many references to Taiwanthe forehead stretched between China and United Statesand theIndo-Pacific. According to the spokesman for the Chinese Foreign Ministry, Wang Wenbindefined “an instrument by individual countries to seek hegemony” not only in the North Atlantic but also in the Asia-Pacific region, which she has turned to in recent years “to show her energy and stir up conflicts”.
Wenbin spoke of NATO as the “product of the Cold War” and stressed that it was the “greatest large military alliance to the world,” he added, “to assess the situation and do that adjustments necessary “. However, NATO “has been sticking to it for a long time old security conceptis obligated battle on the field and it has become a tool for individual countries to seek hegemony,” the spokesman said.
The Atlantic Alliance “confirms – he added – a ‘defensive organizationbut it actually creates all the time comparison and problemsrequires other countries to comply with the basic rules of International Relationsbut ruthlessly wages wars against sovereign countries and bombs them indiscriminately, causing death and displacement of people civilians innocent “. And the Beijing Foreign Ministry still rhetorically asked: “NATO has already caused confusion in Europe, so will it still ruin Asia Pacific and the whole world? “.
Responding to Truss’s comments against China over following the rules if it aims to become a great power, Wang replied that “international rules should be norms international relations based on the goals and principles of United Nations Charterand not to family laws and regulations small circles and small groups”. While, as for the criticism for failing to condemn that Russia after the military aggression against theUkrainethe spokesman noted: “As for China’s position on the Ukraine issue you mentioned, so are we consistent and sure. We have always formulated independent judgments based on the value of the question itself”.