Court grants Caetano Veloso the seizure of Olavo de Carvalho39s

Court grants Caetano Veloso the seizure of Olavo de Carvalho's book sales

Caetano Veloso and Olavo de Carvalho

Caetano Veloso and Olavo de Carvalho

Photo: Reproduction/ Instagram/ Disclosure/ Mauro Ventura

The court in Rio de Janeiro ruled in favor of the singer Caetano Veloso the confiscation of funds from book sales Olavo de Carvalhowho died in January 2022 so that he can receive the amount he won after winning the case against the former president's guru Jair Bolsonaro.

In 2017, Veloso filed a lawsuit after being called a pedophile by the Bolsonaro leader on social media. In the same year, the court issued an injunction and decided to remove the content from the Internet, under penalty of a daily fine of R$10,000. And that was never done. The debts accumulated and exceeded the limit of 3 million reais.

According to TJRJ received from EarthThe 50th Civil Court of Rio granted the singer's defense request and ordered the confiscation of the amounts collected by Editora Record from the sale of Carvalho's books.

The decision was made by Judge Guilherme Pedrosa Lopes, who states in the document that until the inventory is completed, it is the estate's responsibility to pay off the debts incurred during his lifetime.

The lawyer representing the estate of Olavo de Carvalho, when contacted, explained that he had not yet been informed of the decision and that he would respond directly on the file.

The singer's press office responded that he did not intend to comment on this decision.

The report from Earth He also contacted the publisher that sells the author's books, but received no response. The room remains open.

Historical

In 2019, writer Olavo de Carvalho filed a criminal complaint against Caetano Veloso after the musician published an article in Folha de S.Paulo. The document called on the singer to answer for the crimes of libel, slander and insult.

Olavo's lawyer, Francisco Carlos Cabrera, who signed the petition, called the musician a “rogue,” “a criminal disguised as a columnist,” and said Eke had claimed to have been in exile (during the dictatorship) “but never showed any document.” Olavo said in his defense that the artist had violated his honor.

In 2021, the Rio court rejected another appeal from the Bolsonaro guru, who claimed he was unable to pay the entire amount to the singer and the debt was dragging on.

Source: Redação Terra