There was some important news at the hearing that took place this Friday morning in a California court the lawsuit against Gloria Trevi, Sergio Andrade and María Raquenel for alleged corruption of minors.
That's why the journalist and law student is in the United States, Esly Fombonawho was present in the said room tells us what happened that day.
“Today we discussed four points that, in my opinion, are the most important. First, plaintiffs can continue to use a pseudonym. Secondly, the judge authorized the hearing of organizations that support survivors of this type of crime. Thirdly, the second complaint was annexed to the first complaint and fourthly; “The judge stated that this case was 'complex' and authorized the case to be transferred to another court for consideration.”
Esly Fombona
Commenting on the pseudonyms the plaintiffs will continue to use, Esly said: “There is currently a hearing postponed until April 5th This case will determine whether the plaintiffs will continue to use the pseudonym to protect their identities” said.
You might be interested in: Video: Gloria Trevi and her legal battle; that is what is known about it
The journalist spoke about organizations that support victims of sexual abuse and corruption of minors. “The judge indicated that he would like to hear these associations in March to find out why? “The people in this case, the plaintiffs, must continue to use pseudonyms.”
Regarding the second lawsuit, which is attached to the first, Esly said: “This appendix was approved and created as a legal strategy because the judge agreed to join both lawsuits because one of the plaintiffs of the second lawsuit appears in the “first” demand, which was submitted in 2022.”
Gloria Trevi, Sergio Andrade and Mary Boquitas were sued in the USA / Facebook: Gloria Trevi / Internet
Czech: Gloria Trevi continues to fight and won't rest until she clears her image!
The judge's important decision
The journalist pointed out that the judge made a very important decision in this case. The authority maintains that this is a “complex case” that should be referred to another court.
“Following the investigation I have carried out, this is a great opportunity to hear and analyze all the evidence. Despite this decision, the plaintiffs' attorney appealed the decision. However, the judge told him that if he did not agree, he would submit his request to the appropriate office, although we know that he would not proceed further due to the judge's decision.said.
When asked about the next steps in this case, Esly mentioned: “After the judge has determined that the case is 'complex', the dates of the hearings could change, both in March to hear the organizations and in March April to decide whether to continue using pseudonyms
And he added: “Starting today, for complex cases, a notification can be made at any time with a date and court to proceed with that case and a public record will be created as to when the case transfer will occur.” It could be in two, 5, 10 or 15 days or longer and you just need to be aware of that notification.”.
The judge considers the case to be very complex / Instagram: @gloriatrevi
Was Gloria Trevi present at the hearing?
In addition, Fombona pointed out that Gloria Trevi, María Raquenel and Sergio Andrade were not present at this hearing.
“The plaintiffs’ attorney, Karen Barth Menzies, was present at this hearing. Gloria's lawyer Camille Vásquez took part in a video call. In the case of Ms. María Raquenel, she was on the lookout for a call her lawyer made throughout the meeting.”he concluded.
Do not miss: Gloria Trevi, Nicola Porcella and other influencers condemn the attack on Paola Suárez and demand justice