[1/2]Sam Altman, CEO of ChatGPT maker OpenAI, arrives at a bipartisan insights forum on artificial intelligence (AI) for all U.S. Senators hosted by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) at the U.S. Capitol on September 13, 2023 in Washington, USA. Portal/Julia Nikhinson/File Photo Acquire License Rights
Nov 22 (Portal) – Ahead of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman’s four days in exile, several senior researchers sent the board a letter warning of a powerful artificial intelligence discovery that they said could threaten humanity, two said People familiar with the matter told Portal.
The previously unreported letter and AI algorithm were a catalyst for the board ousting Altman, the poster boy of generative AI, the two sources said. Before his triumphant return late Tuesday, more than 700 employees had threatened to quit in solidarity with their sacked leader and join backer Microsoft (MSFT.O).
The sources cited the letter as one factor in a lengthy list of board complaints that led to Altman’s firing. Portal was not able to verify a copy of the letter. The researchers who wrote the letter did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
OpenAI declined to comment.
According to one of the sources, longtime executive Mira Murati mentioned the project, called Q*, to employees on Wednesday and said a letter had been sent to the board before this weekend’s events.
After the story was published, an OpenAI spokeswoman said Murati told employees what the media reports were about, but she did not comment on the accuracy of the information.
The maker of ChatGPT has made progress on Q* (pronounced Q-Star), which some internally believe could be a breakthrough in the startup’s quest for superintelligence, also known as artificial general intelligence (AGI), one said of respondents told Portal. OpenAI defines AGI as AI systems that are smarter than humans.
Given the huge computing resources, the new model is capable of solving certain mathematical problems, the person said on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak on behalf of the company. Although only math performance was at elementary school students’ level, passing such tests made researchers very optimistic about Q*’s future success, the source said.
Portal could not independently verify Q*’s claimed capabilities.
(This story has been corrected to state in the headline and paragraph 5 that Sam Altman’s firing occurred after a letter was sent to the board, which was not caused by the letter.)
Anna Tong and Jeffrey Dastin in San Francisco and Krystal Hu in New York; Edited by Kenneth Li and Lisa Shumaker
Our standards: The Trust Principles.
Acquire license rights, opens new tab