FIGAROVOX/CHRONICLE – About forty MPs from the four left-wing factions in the assembly co-signed a motion for a resolution calling for condemnation of “Israel’s institutionalization of an apartheid regime.” For the lawyer, part of the left is struggling to deal with anti-Semitism.
Gilles-William Gold Nadel is a lawyer and essayist. Every week he decodes the messages for FigaroVox.
I will not indulge in the ridiculousness of discussing the resolution calling for a boycott of Israel, tabled by thirty-eight MPs of this extreme left, which does not exist, for lack of a title, seems contrived, inspired by an imaginary Islamo-leftism scratch it far right.
I fundamentally refuse to argue against anti-Semitism when I sense it in my educated flesh.
If I know, disqualifying the insult – Nazism or apartheid – deliberately replaced the documented argument.
When I see an obsessive grudge like submitting a resolution to go out of business just days after their election while France grapples with immense and urgent difficulties.
When a disproportionate double standard is imposed on the individual Jew or the Jewish state while turning a blind eye to the Islamist terrorism that has been silently massacring Palestinian Jews in Israel or seven hundred Christians in Nigeria for the past three months.
When finally the state of the Jewish people is treated like the Jew of the states.
I know very well who I’m dealing with. And I don’t argue.
The only double and sad interest of this new left parliamentary clown is to state once again that anti-Semitism in France is essentially embodied by the extreme left in its most dangerous political or intellectual manifestation.
And that this left-wing anti-Semitism corresponds very closely to the portrait of the overthrown Jew hated by the extreme right yesterday.
This Palestinian left, which blindly espouses the Arabic narrative of Palestine, is just an avatar of the Islamo-left.
Gilles-William Gold Pin
In general, my reader is well aware that the struggle I am waging against the dangers of an extreme left being treated with too much benevolent indulgence is my first struggle.
In this context, I recently published a handbook of resistance to left-wing fascism to stimulate debate.
Of course, in one chapter I wanted to specifically mention the extreme left’s pathological anti-Zionism, which I think is one of the most obvious manifestations of its fascist tendencies.
Before explaining that this Palestinian left, which blindly espouses the Arab narrative of Palestine, is just an avatar of the Islamo-left, I would like to write that it is entirely possible to be sensitive to the Palestinian-Arab cause without Palestinians to be.
I have always maintained that the Arabs of Palestine had a good record which they regrettably sacrificed on the altar of an Islamo-nationalism closed to any territorial compromise.
All governments of the Israeli left, from Fathers to Barak, will have proposed to the representatives of the Arabs of Palestine control of almost all disputed territories, including part of Jerusalem East.
The end of a state for the Jewish people on the smallest part of a territory they consider their own for historical-religious reasons interests them much more than the creation of another Arab-Muslim state on a territory coveted by two competing peoples with legitimate rights .
This regret at the lack of a partner for a final peace through a territorial compromise that requires two certainly does not make me forget the mediocrity of Israel’s political personnel, recruited by a criminal electoral system with full proportional representation.
But even the most enlightened Israeli politician is unable to remedy an Islamic Palestinian irredentism fascinated by terrorist and anti-Semitic violence, which the far-left Palestinians are so fond of watching.
Thus, the extreme left shows benevolence towards the terrorist movement emanating from the Muslim Brotherhood Hamas, which is fundamentally and officially anti-Semitic and regularly sends rockets into Israel, while observing the replication of the Israeli democratic state with strict, unbounded borders.
For one, maximum indulgence and compassion; on the other hand, disgust and indifference towards its inhabitants.
This left-wing indifference to the fate of Jews in Israel is of the same stagnant water as the uncomprehending staring at French Jews being massacred by local or imported Islamists.
I come to mutant anti-Semitism as described in The New Breviary of Hatred (Ramsay 2001).
The far-right fascist loathed the stereotype of the spineless, stateless Moth Jew. The extreme left-wing fascist abhors the stereotype of the nationalistic and belligerent Jew.
Gilles-William Gold Pin
It must be understood that in the unconscious of the Islamist left, the most fanatical of Palestinian Arabs is endearing because he embodies otherness, and the Israeli Jew despicable because he defends the borders of a nation-state. Westerners, like an ordinary French patriot, wear a beret.
Let’s go further: while the far left idolizes the deported Jew in striped pajamas, it sees the defending Israeli as a square white man.
The far-right fascist loathed the stereotype of the spineless, stateless Moth Jew. The extreme left-wing fascist abhors the stereotype of the nationalistic and belligerent Jew.
“Tell me how you are, I’ll tell you how I hate you,” says the timeless anti-Semite to the Jew of the present.
From this explanatory description of an anti-Semitic virus mutating through Jewish history, we can understand that those in France who are unhesitating to take allegations by a family of criminals at face value are more likely to accept claims by French police that they are being systemic racists, are very much the same that there is no harm in Hamas blindly bombing the Israeli population, but the obligation to retaliate against them by targeting the terrorists, but at the risk of reaching civilians who intentionally misused as shields, viewed as a disgrace.
In France, therefore, under the influence of this ideology, which does not stand out for its subtlety, the PCF, the Insoumis or some ecologists of doom embody this viral Islamo-Left politically, both by deadly ideological passion and by vital electoral necessity.
Mélenchon has always supported the anti-Semite Corbyn. It is also the head of rebellious France, David Guiraud (signer of the aforementioned parliamentary resolution), who did not hesitate on Twitter last May to pretend that young Jews were dancing for joy at the sight of the Al-Aqsa mosque on fire. There were only two trees on fire…. Although I denounced this misinformation and was followed by the very reputable Samira El Gadir, lie tracker on TF1, our suburban political arsonist has not given up his arsonist. But from Ilan Halimi to Mireille Knoll, past Hyperkosher and Mohammed Merah, the Islamic menace to French Jews is neither speculation nor fantasy.
But one cannot understand this perversion of the Islamo-political left without considering the associative or media excesses of the last decade.
At the media level, Palestinianism benefits from a firepower identical to its Islamic left ideological matrix.
Gilles-William Gold Pin
Therefore, Amnesty International, which has specifically accused Israel of apartheid practices against the blind factual evidence, is no longer the respectable organization that once had the noble aim of freeing prisoners held on political grounds.
Amnesty is now a left-wing NGO working on behalf of illegal migrants, and its new president had already discredited herself by spreading false information on social media, accusing Israel of poisoning Arafat, even the latter’s widow , Souha, does not support …
At the media level, Palestinianism benefits from a firepower identical to its Islamic left ideological matrix.
The same newspapers that develop the subject of a racist French police have logically represented the tendency towards infinite severity for one and limitless leniency for the other.
For example, Le Monde (which also officially endorsed Corbyn against Johnson in an editorial) now regularly publishes the one-page articles by a militant journalist, Clothilde Mraffko, to cite the most bizarre example, which was simultaneously published in a Middle East Eye magazine that, according to La Tribune, is run by funded by the Muslim Brotherhood, accuses the Zionists of disfiguring Palestine by planting trees and draining swamps.
The shameful resolution of misguided parliamentarians is therefore only the last inconsequential avatar of this political and media Islamo-Linkism, which the trivial moral arrogance cannot face.
I saw that the organized Jewish community wanted to denounce it.
Let those who have been screaming in the desert for too long mutter that it is not the ghostly far right that is the danger, but the far left in media majesty, better late than never.
But that it is still very late for the French Jews.
SEE ALSO – “There is a whole history of anti-Semitism born of the left in the 19th century,” recalls Renaud Dély