Prince Harry has accused Buckingham Palace of withholding information about phone tapping by the press for a “long time”.
Access the article and all the content of the site
with the dedicated app, newsletters, podcasts and live updates.
Already subscribed? Login here!
SPECIAL OFFER
BEST OFFER
YEARLY
€79.99
€19
1 year long
CHOOSE NOW
MONTHLY
€6.99
€1 PER MONTH
For 6 months
CHOOSE NOW
SPECIAL OFFER
BEST OFFER
YEARLY
€79.99
€11.99
1 year long
CHOOSE NOW
MONTHLY
€6.99
€2 PER MONTH
For 12 months
CHOOSE NOW
SPECIAL OFFER
Read the article and the entire site ilmessaggero.it
1 year for €9.99 €89.99
Subscribe with Google
or
€1 per month for 6 months
Automatic renewal. Switch off whenever you want.
- Unlimited access to articles on the website and in the app
- The 7:30 good morning newsletter
- The Ore18 newsletter for updates of the day
- The podcasts of our signatures
- Insights and live updates
The Prince Harry he accused Buckingham Palace that he had kept information from him for “a long time”. phone tapping by the tabloids to which he has been exposed in the past.
King Charles and Camilla in Berlin, the first trip abroad and dinner with German cousins: Why this visit has a high symbolic value
Harry and the listening devices, everything that happened
This new detail about the tumultuous and often conflicting relationship between the Duke of Sussex hey windsor emerged during the High Court of Justice hearings London for the lawsuit brought by half a dozen VIPs, including the second son of King Charles III, against the editorial group Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL), which publishes the Chron and the Mail on Sunday, before the British courts over alleged “serious” illegal wiretapping.
The document
In a document presented to the court by Harry’s lawyers, we read that the palace withheld this information in order to live a quiet life and avoid possible legal action by the prince against the media. “It has only become clear in recent years – the Duke’s document goes on – after I filed a lawsuit myself.”
The Defense of the Mail
After two days in the courtroom, the prince preferred not to appear today, also because the Mail group defended itself against allegations by VIPs of allegedly illegal methods of gathering information. Adrian Beltrami, one of the ANL’s lawyers, “dismissed the charges in their entirety,” saying they were brought too late. He cited a law that requires plaintiffs to file statutory data protection claims within six years of the time they arose.
Read the full article
on Messenger