Ilary Blasi and Totti from the truths revealed on television

Ilary Blasi and Totti, from the truths revealed on television to the evidence of treason submitted to the judge. e’s what you know:

Ilary Blasi’s truth about the end of her marriage to Francesco Totti, expected in the Netflix documentary film “Unica”, roughly follows the events… Already a subscriber? Login here!

SPECIAL OFFER

BEST OFFER

YEARLY

€79.99

19€
for 1 year

CHOOSE NOW

MONTHLY

€6.99

€1 PER MONTH
For 6 months

CHOOSE NOW

SPECIAL OFFER

SPECIAL OFFER

MONTHLY

€6.99

€1 PER MONTH
For 6 months

CHOOSE NOW

SPECIAL OFFER

Read the article and the entire website ilmessaggero.it

1 year for €9.99 €89.99

Subscribe with Google

or
€1 per month for 6 months

Automatic renewal. Disable it whenever you want.

  • Unlimited access to articles on the website and app
  • The Good Morning newsletter at 7.30am
  • The Ore18 newsletter for the day’s updates
  • The podcasts of our signatures
  • Insights and live updates

The truth of Ilary Blasi about the end of his marriage Francesco Tottiexpected in Documentary film “Unica” from Netflixroughly follows the requests with which the television presenter asked the Rome court to indict her husband separation. For the former football player, this is a spectacularization of the content of the proceedings, which could disturb the composure of the judge in charge of the file, as well as an economic exploitation of a private matter. In September 2022, he also decided to publicly reveal his version of the facts about the end of his great love for Ilary in a long interview with “Corriere della Sera”. But at this point – this is the distinction Totti wants to emphasize – the verdict on the separation had not yet been reached.

Totti and Ilary, the next hearing

So far, the judge has found that the former Giallorossi captain must pay his wife 12,500 euros for the maintenance of their children and has allowed her to stay and live in his villa in EUR, at least until all three boys are independent from an economic point of view . In the next Hearing scheduled for January 24th, Judge Simona Rossi must decide which evidence she will allow and which not from the evidence presented by the spouses. Both have attached a lengthy statement to their respective defense statements List of witnesses be consulted; They stored chats, voice messages and photos: in the case of the Mediaset presenter, the latter were also collected thanks to the help of a private detective she hired. In the documentary, Blasi recounted Totti’s first secret meetings with Noemi Bocchi And it is precisely around the new flame of “Pupone” that the thesis of marital infidelity disputed by the former Letterman revolves. A relationship that became official after the couple announced their desire to separate in June 2022, with the common goal of preserving the composure of their children. A goal that has been sacrificed over the last year and a half, considering the exchange of mutual accusations in the press and on television.

In the documentary, Ilary admits to having coffee with another man in Milan. But as the former football player claims in the defense statement submitted to the court, his wife had previously had extramarital affairs. A thesis that is also supported by Fabrizio Corona: “Before the coffee man, there were others.” Even if the king of the paparazzi later admitted: “Totti always cheated on her.”

The back and forth about Rolexes

It remains that “Rolex knot”. According to the decision of the Court of Rome, made at the end of the possession proceedings, the expensive watches that Ilary had confiscated were returned a safe is also available to her ex-husband. For now, they remain in custody there and cannot be used by either of them, at least until one of them proves ownership of the Rolex. Blasi’s defense denies that a verdict is pending on this, contrary to claims made by the former Roma captain’s defense. According to the Civil Code, at least until a court decides otherwise, the presumption of joint ownership of all movable property acquired by the spouses (even if it was acquired in separation of property) applies until the contrary is proven. In short, the “Rolex question” remains open for now.

Read the full article
on Il Messaggero