“Ugly ugly. This is how royal observers and British and American experts define the coronation of Charles III, scheduled for May 6. The spotlight is on Harry and Meghan, whose capricious and flimsy behavior has also bored the ex-actress’s compatriots.
Today, the “Washington Post” points out that world attention is focused on family disputes rather than on the historical event: “Palazzo’s strategy is to talk about secular signs, horse-drawn carriages, antique clothes, dedicated hashtags and in a few lines liquidate the Presence of Harry and Absence of Meghan”.
Also Read: Coronation Of King Charles, Here’s The Official List: Who’s Ruining The Party For The Royal Family
The Duchess’ decision to remain in California to celebrate Archie’s fourth birthday, which falls on the day of the ceremony, was met with relief rather than satisfaction: “Buckingham Palace probably didn’t want Markle any more than they did.” wanted,” she wrote to Autumn Brewington, before explaining that this is just the latest chapter in the dysfunctional and conflicted relationship between the Windsors in London and the Dukes of Sussex in Montecito.
The couple’s allegations against the royal family are well known – from racism to spreading negative stories about the former actress in exchange for positive media coverage for the rest of the family – but what’s surprising is that Harry and Meghan didn’t just turn in the titles the much-hated institution, but they also wanted those of “prince” and “princess” for Archie and Lilibet Diana. The columnist points out, “Her back and forth is exhausting and disappointing, even for those of us who have had sympathy for Meghan and the obstacles she has had to overcome. After giving up their royal duties, can’t they just be rich, healthy and happy? No. At least not yet.”
A double registration, or rather, a double billing, as unpleasant as the compromise at the ceremony: “We do not need to know which side snubbed the other – the journalist underlined –. Harry returns for his father’s important cause, ignoring the monarchy he ran from.” It’s still the time of blame and frost. Like that of the Princess of Wales, Kate Middleton. Former BBC reporter Tom Bower told GB News: “We all have to be thankful that Kate, I think, stopped Meghan from coming and said under no circumstances would she keep her there.” If she had come, she would have had to sit in the back .” In the Shadow of Westminster Abbey.