Rebekah Vardy and husband Jamie looked cozy as they posed in matching pajamas on Christmas Eve.
TV personality Rebekah, 40, and her footballer beau Jamie, 35, were in good spirits as they stood in front of the Christmas tree at their lavish home.
They were seen arm in arm as they wore red checked clothing and Rebekah beamed as she leaned towards Jamie.
In love: Rebekah Vardy, 40, and her husband Jamie, 35, looked cozy as they posed in matching pajamas on Christmas Eve
Leicester City player Jamie was seen smiling as he looked into the camera at a moment which was emblazoned with the words ‘Merry Christmas’.
In another photo, Rebekah could be seen with her arms around Jamie’s shoulders after jumping in the air and throwing her legs around his waist.
She captioned her post: “Happy Christmas Eve.”
Festive spirit: Rebekah was seen with her arms around Jamie’s shoulders after leaping into the air and throwing her legs around his waist in a swipe
Rebekah shared a festival family photo earlier this week as the dramatization of her trial of Wagatha Christie played on TV
Vardy vs. Rooney: A courtroom drama that aired Wednesday and Thursday allowing viewers to relive the drama of the WAG libel trial.
But both Coleen and Rebekeah seemed to be trying to take their minds off the series as they spent a lot of time with their families.
Family: It comes after Rebekah took her children to Belton House in Lincolnshire for a day out before Vardy vs Rooney: A Courtroom Drama aired this week
Rebekah took her children to Belton House in Lincolnshire for the day hours before the show aired.
WAG shared a photo of herself with children Taylor, 11, Sofia, 7, Finley, 4, and Olivia, 2.
Rebekah is also mother to daughter Megan, 17, from a previous relationship.
Keeping busy: Coleen Rooney and Rebekah both shared festival family photos as the dramatization of her trial of Wagatha Christie played on TV
Meanwhile Coleen and her husband Wayne were enjoying a family day out in Lapland UK with their sons Klay (9), Kit (6) and Cass (4).
The media personality shared a sweet picture of her young family posing for a Christmas photo with Santa and said they had an “amazing day”.
“Thanks @laplanduk for an amazing day as always,” Coleen captioned the snap.
Reaction: Vardy vs. Rooney: A Courtroom Drama Viewers were smitten with the new two-part series, which aired Wednesday and Thursday nights – saying they “love” the show.
In the picture, the boys are beaming as they pose next to Santa and hold matching dog plushies. Her eldest son Kai, 13, was absent from the trip.
The Channel 4 series stars Chanel Creswell as Coleen and Natalia Tena as Rebekah alongside Michael Sheen as Coleen’s attorney, David Sherbourne.
Vardy v Rooney: A Courtroom Drama, recreated from the real court transcripts, gives viewers a chance to relive the non-televised scenes from the courtroom and all the drama that kept the public and media in suspense for weeks.
Love it: Those watching at home said they were “addicted” to the TV offer – which was created from real court transcripts of Coleen and Rebekah’s libel fight this summer – and one even said, “This is my World Cup final.” !“
The former friends first fell out publicly in 2019 when Coleen accused Rebekah of sharing posts from her personal Instagram account with The Sun.
Her rigorous search for the culprit earned her the title Wagatha Christie, in honor of crime writer Agatha Christie.
Rebekah denied the claims and sued for defamation but lost in the High Court in July, where her evidence was found “manifestly contradictory” and “not credible”.
In October she was ordered to pay 90 per cent of Coleen’s legal fees, with the first £800,000 to be paid within six weeks.
The former Dancing on Ice contestant also has her own lawyers’ bills to pay, meaning the huge cost of her failed defamation lawsuit is around £4million.
Rebekah is reportedly facing an estimated court bill of £1.5million following her libel battle in Wagatha Christie High Court.
WAG, whose reputation is in tatters after scoring one of the worst own goals in British legal history, is believed to have to raise £800,000 within weeks.
New: The series recreates the legal battle between the WAGS that became known as the “Wagatha Christie” trial (Coleen and Wayne pictured in court).
It comes to the hands of a High Court judge who dismissed her evidence as “evasive or implausible” in one of the most closely watched cases in recent years.
She was accused of intentionally deleting WhatsApp messages central to the case, as it was suspected her agent also intentionally dropped her phone in the North Sea.
Vardy and her footballer husband stood by the bill after Ms Justice Steyn ruled in a ruling in Rooney’s favor that parts of her sworn statements were “manifestly inconsistent”, “not credible” and needed to be treated as “very”. great caution”.
On Air: The programme, produced by Chalkboard, producer of the BBC’s historical murder series Murder, Mystery and My Family, will air on Wednesdays and Thursdays this week
She lost her high-profile defamation lawsuit against Rooney in July when Judge Steyn ruled that Rooney’s viral social media post accusing Vardy of leaking her private information to the press was “essentially true.”
It followed a viral social media post in which Rooney revealed that she had posted fake stories on her Instagram page. These false stories then surfaced in The Sun newspaper.
Since she’d changed her settings so only one user could see it, she felt confident in making the famous declaration, “It’s… Rebekah Vardy’s account.”
Drama: The former friends first fell out publicly in 2019 when Coleen accused Rebekah of sharing posts from her private Instagram account with The Sun
In an order released Tuesday, the judge ruled that Vardy should pay 90% of Rooney’s costs.
Rooney incurred total costs of more than £2m but £350,000 of that had already been accumulated ahead of the May trial so this was removed to give a final figure of £1,667,860.
Vardy has been ordered to pay £800,000 of the cost bill by 4pm on November 15.
Not happy: Rebekah denied the claims and sued for defamation but lost in the High Court in July, where her evidence was ruled “manifestly inconsistent” and “not credible”.