After the opening of the investigation by the Milan Public Prosecutor's Office involving Chiara Ferragni and the Balocco company for the promotion of the Pink Christmas Pandoro, which was sponsored last year by the influencer with a request to buy it at a very high price The market one , to do charity, investigators and investigators are already at work. Deputy Public Prosecutor Eugenio Fusco, who is leading the investigation, in which there is currently no crime or suspects, has instructed the Economic and Financial Police Unit of the Guardia di Finanza to collect the necessary material to obtain an overview of the matter. He will then also summon the Cremonese businesswoman for further feedback and clarifications, supported by the lawyers of the Bana law firm, who appeared early this morning on the fourth floor of the Milan Palace of Justice. But in the meantime, the influencer's problems don't seem to end. The Safilo Group has terminated the license agreement for the design, production and distribution of the Chiara Ferragni brand eyewear collections, “due to an alleged “breach of contractual obligations,” according to the company. And Fratelli d'Italia is calling for the Golden Ambrogino to be withdrawn. “I will not veto it and will leave any kind of consideration to the city council,” said Mayor Giuseppe Sala, limiting himself to his statement. As for the Balocco case, the Fiamme Gialle will turn to the antitrust authorities by the end of the year to obtain the documents related to the investigation, which ended in recent days with a heavy fine, although without presenting an order for unfair business practices: over a million in fines for two companies attributable to the well-known blogger Fenice and TBS Crew – The Blonde Salad, and 420,000 euros for the manufacturers of the Christmas dessert. In addition, the contracts concluded with the Cuneo company, any emails exchanged or other documents related to the operation, which, according to advertising, should have resulted in a donation of an amount, are also acquired by Cuneo's lawyers or, more likely, delivered to Ms. von Fedez. Relevant to the care of small patients treated at the Turin facility. All this to shed light on the case and understand if in fact, as the influencer indicated in her apology video, there was a “miscommunication” involving them before her disappearance from social media, that is the meaning. “ Charitable activities, which I have always done and will continue to do, distinguish from commercial activities. In this context, it would be “impracticable” to challenge the fraud unless surprises arise during the investigation, while instead a commercial fraud could be suspected related to the “ethical quality” of the “movable property”, that is, the Pandoro sold . Finally, the investigation could also extend to the similar story of the advertising of Dolci Preziosi's Easter eggs. The case was opened following a complaint from Codacons and Assourt alleging that “a large number of individuals”, i.e. consumers, were defrauded. The lawsuit was filed in 104 public prosecutors' offices, with Milan's being the first to be filed, followed by Cuneo, where Balocco is based.
Reproduction reserved ©