Spielberg is right you can fight anti Semitism by talking

Spielberg is right, you can fight anti Semitism by talking about it

Who wrote to the director Claudio Cerasa

To the director – “W anti-fascist and anti-communist Italy”.
Roberto Alatri

To the Director – Given the demonstrations at universities and not just across the West, given the incidents against Jews which, as you yourself remember, have increased to a frightening extent, given the fact that the information is so distorted, I wonder : Had Hamas already won? ?his media war? In the face of overwhelming evidence such as the videos of the violence of the militiamen themselves, the question arises: How is such dullness of these souls, always ready for humanitarian and ecological struggles, possible? The recent femicide in Italy was a scandal, but few feminists expressed their contempt for the horrors of October 7th. So I have to assume that not even Goebbels would have succeeded in this cultural operation. In this too, Hamas surpassed the Nazis.
Enrico Cerchione

I'm not sure if Hamas is winning its media war, but I am sure that Steven Spielberg's method needs to be cloned to win the media war. Method summed up the director himself as follows: “The best way to fight anti-Semitism and racism is to keep talking about it, because as soon as you stop, these phenomena get worse.” As the founder of the USC Shoah Foundation, which talks about the has the world's largest video collection of Holocaust survivors and witnesses, Spielberg, moved by these intentions, agreed to the foundation's collection of video testimonies about atrocities committed by Hamas against Israelis on October 7 to be included in the collection of witness statements of Holocaust survivors. And Spielberg did it with this motivation: “The recording of interviews and the continued collection of testimonies about the Holocaust are intended to fulfill our promise to the survivors: that their stories will be shared to preserve history and work toward a world without work.” Anti-Semitism or hatred of any kind.” To contextualize October 7th is to remember. And never to say it again: October 7th needs to be put in the right context, like Spielberg did. Raids, exterminations. Never again.

To the Director – The now ill-fated congressional hearing of the directors of MIT, Penn and Harvard, where, when asked whether praising the genocide of the Jews would constitute a violation of their universities' code of conduct, the three naïves deny and admit states that “it depends on the context”. I wonder if this is the swan song of woke culture or if the polarization of debate even on topics that until yesterday were considered taboo is not the start of a new anti-system wave (read Pro Trump).
Marco Vanucci, London South Bank University

Wokist culture tends to be very sensitive when there is the possibility of demonizing the West, but proves insensitive when it has to defend those the West defends. If one chooses, in a Manichean fashion, to divide the world between the oppressed and the oppressors, one may end up confusing the oppressed with the oppressors and the oppressor with the oppressed. And when one is used to seeing the only form of freedom of expression in claiming that the West is always wrong and that anyone who claims to be oppressed by it is necessarily telling the truth, one can see anti-Semitism in a sophisticated form of anti-Semitism. Racism.

To the Director – Dear Cerasa, the December 3rd Minuz on TV was incredible. As for me, I noticed that Amazon competes with the melody of “In my life” by the Beatles, Nada wins with two hits (“Ma che Fredo fa”, original version, for Yamamay, “Desperate Love” with adapted lyrics the needs of “A, two A, two A, A-hA” ). Let's consider that now when I recycle glass I sing: “How beautiful it is to make love”, otherwise I won't know where the cap belongs. If you have any doubts, you should rely on the soundtracks…
Marco Monguzzi

To the Director – I consider the withdrawal of Minister Giuseppe Valditara on the appointment of Anna Paola Concia as guarantor (together with Sister Monia Alfieri and the representative of the people of the family, Paola Zerman, two true Catholic personalities) of formation in personal relationships serious mistake at school. But if the Left, as the interested party itself admitted, criticized the former Democratic Party MP for accepting the office, it showed the sectarianism that has now led her to retreat into the “Valtellina redoubts” of the Locking up anti-fascism In defending the “new” (un)civil rights, the right has managed to take on one of the accusations made by its opponents: that of homophobia. In fact, other than emotional attitudes, there is no reason to say “no” to Concia. Furthermore, the right has shown an unacceptable level of ignorance. As a historical feminist, Concia has nothing to do with the (sub)culture of gender: feminism wants to free women from their legacies; Gender destroys his nature, effectively turning him into a man with a uterus, stripped of even his dignity. In addition, if Anna Paola had certainly carried out this task with balance, she would not have been obliged, like the other people appointed by the minister, to go personally to schools to preach tolerance. Their job would have been to create a legally mandated program and monitor its application and accuracy.
Giuliano Cazzola