The title of this article may surprise the reader as it doesn’t seem to have any logic, but that’s the point. The manmade “global warming” discourse is becoming increasingly childish, requiring a veritable torrent of articles, “research”, events and sensationalist media calls to try to appease the “very urgent” issue for society. The unbridled panic is completely meaningless. In this case, there is a collection of embarrassing situations when nature doesn’t go according to plan, complicating the situation for alarmists. Nothing unusual for real scientists in the field of meteorology and climate. In fact, fluctuations in atmospheric parameters (temperature, precipitation, cloudiness, etc.) within seasonal patterns (seasons) are the focus of the studies, as there is an interest in understanding the connections and their effects and in enriching the knowledge of the climate and its regional ones aspects.
For the alarmists, however, variations contrary to discourse must be quickly separated so that even cold is produced due to the “warming”. There are countless past discussions about poorly made correlations and poorly explained assumptions. The fact is that if the “greenhouse effect” worsens, for example, there could be no return points for falling temperatures. This clearly shows that the hypothesis fails in its logical construction (in fact, it fails in every respect, from paleoclimate reconstructions to the present day, in seasonal variations that don’t follow its “rules”).
Of course, with a few excuses, they do it very well. An example is to say that global circulation redistributes this “extra heat” and therefore temperatures eventually drop. Without this motto, they will always come up with other unconvincing explanations. The fact is that the redistribution of energy between the various terrestrial systems is already happening naturally and to argue that this is the reason that the (nonexistent) problem is “mitigated” to flee from the past knowledge that the The tropics of planet Earth (from the equator line to the lines of the tropics, Cancer in the north and Capricorn in the south) operate in excess energy, while the polar regions operate in energy deficit that accentuates or decreases in their respective winters and summers, respectively. The redistribution of energy takes place in terrestrial systems such as the atmosphere, which acts faster, and the oceans, which act much more slowly. Both attenuate these spatial differences in energy distribution through natural processes. In other words, it rains in the wet because what happens in nature is used to justify why the greenhouse hypothesis failed.
Analysis of temperature variations over the last season
Today we will discuss a summary a case study of the pattern observed in temperature fluctuations in the southern hemisphere heading into the onset of its summer and the expected projections for the northern hemisphere heading into winter. In a brief review of what our spring was like in Brazil and a significant part of the southern hemisphere, we saw very interesting events.
Since the end of October, a month of our spring, a large part of Brazil has been hit by cold air masses that have swept the states in the south, southeast, parts of the midwest and even reached the south of the Amazon. Temperatures fell below expectations for this period. In evaluating the repeated meteorological images presented in the southern hemisphere, we saw that cold air occupied much of its area, specifically at least a third of the southern region of the Pacific Ocean (the entire sector that includes the center of the its southeast coast adjoining sectors from South America to Antarctica), South America (Chile, Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay and parts of Brazil and Bolivia) and even occupied a vast area of the South Atlantic Ocean reaching the southwest coast of Africa (Fig.01).
The described situation, which lasted more or less until the end of November, showed the intensity of the action of Mobile Polar Anticyclones APMs (surface, coldcore, highpressure atmospheric systems with large spatial coverage). and which represent a more rapid displacement, starting from the polar region towards the tropics), originating in particular from the Ross Sea region and some from the Weddell Sea, both in Antarctica, moving via the Pacific and Atlantic regions respectively. Along the way, some of these APMs produced hazy bands that caused sustained rainfall, particularly over Brazil, and the formation of some extratropical cyclones (giant systems with low surface pressure) typical of midlatitudes. This condition would tend to decrease over the summer, confining the action of APMs and extratropical cyclones to much higher latitudes, making their usual winter actions less frequent, a fact that did not occur in 2022. Is this a fanfare? Of course not, because each year has its uniqueness and it is up to climatology To them and to analyze the case correctly in context. An example of a question should be whether there is a connection between what happened this spring in the southern hemisphere and the record low temperatures of winter 2021 in central Antarctica. Was it a pattern that continued? Were there any interventions in the atmospheric dynamics? What were the consequences for agriculture, energy and water supply? These would be some interesting questions to ask, not to mention the fact that the reductionist greenhouse hypothesis once again fails.
“Men are always to blame”
With changing hemispheres, Europe is preparing for a worrying winter as energy used for heating is rationed due to gas shortages in Russia and the high prices practiced in the market. Some residents of German cities, for example, are already stocking up on firewood. In France, on top of expected rationing, people are bracing for higher energy bills. Other countries intend to simply cut off the supply to heat abusers. The situation should at least be embarrassing for the harassers of the heating tracts, if they were still ashamed. They blew a fanfare of high temperatures during the European summer of 2022, which lasted less than 20 days, but remain silent in the face of the real threat of a long winter’s cold that will devastate millions across Europe. One wonders: Given the increase in temperature caused by the “greenhouse effect”, should people no longer fear winters in the northern hemisphere? We will answer this question shortly.
Apparently, the “greenhouse effect” hypothesis causing “global warming” is quite selective. When there is an increase in temperatures, this is clearly evidenced, but when temperatures are low or seasonal seasons show a pattern that differs from what is expected, such as when temperatures rise. then they are treated simply as statistical errors. If that explanation isn’t enough, remember that they do a very good job of justifying that all events are nothing more than “climate change,” which is always manmade. This means that the glove fits all hands, whether it’s hot or cold. As Kurt G. Blüchel would say: It’s always the men’s fault.